Air Spring Hold Control for Unnecessary Stiffness Switching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Active suspension systems with variable stiffness springs experience repeated switching between high and low stiffness states due to discontinuous vehicle acceleration, leading to mechanical wear, computational inefficiency, and uncomfortable driving experiences during dynamic conditions.

Innovation Solution

A control system that determines a spring state hold condition based on the rate of change of acceleration, sending a hold control signal to maintain high stiffness during dynamic driving conditions, and adjusts stiffness states based on adjusted acceleration thresholds considering the rate of change of acceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the air spring stiffness is switched based on acceleration threshold values, then the suspension adapts to road conditions, but repeated switching during dynamic driving causes mechanical wear and uncomfortable driving experience

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension adaptation to road conditionsVSAvoidmechanical component durability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control system performs preliminary evaluation by assessing the rate of change of acceleration (jerk) before triggering a stiffness switch. This preliminary action prevents premature or unnecessary switching during dynamic maneuvers, reducing mechanical wear while maintaining necessary adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces jerk (rate of change of acceleration) as an intermediary parameter between the primary acceleration signal and the stiffness switching decision. This intermediary provides additional context about the driving dynamics, allowing the system to distinguish between genuine road conditions requiring adaptation and transient effects causing unnecessary switching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Speed

If the control system continuously monitors acceleration to manage spring operation, then the suspension responds to road conditions, but processing large quantities of acceleration data increases computational load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to road conditionsVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control system extracts only the essential features from the acceleration data - specifically the rate of change of acceleration (jerk) - rather than processing the entire acceleration signal. This extraction approach maintains responsive control while significantly reducing computational requirements by focusing on the most relevant parameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuously processing all acceleration data points, the system applies partial monitoring by evaluating specific derived parameters (jerk) only when needed for switching decisions. This partial action approach provides sufficient information for effective control without the excessive computational burden of full signal processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If the air spring switches stiffness state frequently to track acceleration changes, then the suspension maintains optimal performance, but mechanical components experience accelerated wear and tear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesuspension performance optimizationVSAvoidcomponent service life
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from the jerk signal to regulate switching frequency. By monitoring the rate of change of acceleration, the system receives feedback about driving dynamics that prevents unnecessary switching during transient conditions, thereby extending component service life while maintaining performance when truly needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system performs preliminary assessment of driving conditions through jerk evaluation before executing stiffness switches. This preliminary action filters out transient acceleration variations that would otherwise trigger unnecessary switching, reducing mechanical wear while preserving suspension performance for genuine road condition changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250313052A1Suspension system with hold control
Publication Date: 2025.10.09 JAGUAR LAND ROVER LTD
  • US20250313052A1 patent drawing
  • US20250313052A1 patent drawing
  • US20250313052A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects relate to control systems for an air spring of a suspension system of a vehicle. The control system is configured to, when the air spring is operating in a high stiffness state during vehicle motion, receive a signal indicative of a rate of change of acceleration of the vehicle. The control system is configured to determine if a spring state hold condition is satisfied in dependence on the rate of change of acceleration. If the spring state hold condition is determined to be satisfied, the control system is configured to output a hold control signal to cause the air spring to remain operating in the high stiffness state.