Air Spring Pressure Control via Valve Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional fluid suspension systems face challenges with accurate height control due to the cost and complexity of height sensors, which are prone to damage in aggressive under-vehicle environments, and pressure-based systems struggle with reliability and installation time, especially when dealing with varying vehicle loads and suspension characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A control system that maps the correlation between air spring pressure changes and valve-open-time to predict and achieve target pressures without height sensors, using a valve, pressure sensor, and control circuitry to iteratively adjust air spring pressure, allowing for open-loop control and user customization.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If height sensors are used for accurate closed-loop control of suspension height, then height control precision is improved, but device complexity and installation cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight control precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes height sensors from the system entirely, extracting only the necessary measurement function through pressure sensing. By measuring air spring pressure instead of directly measuring height, the system achieves height control capability without the complexity and cost of height sensors, while avoiding their vulnerability to damage in under-vehicle environments

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces air spring pressure as an intermediary measurement parameter between the control system and suspension height. Instead of directly measuring height with sensors in the under-vehicle environment, the system measures pressure at a protected location and uses this as a proxy to infer and control suspension height, thereby protecting the measurement system from harsh environmental conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If height sensors are installed on vehicles not designed for them, then height control capability is achieved, but installation time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheight control capabilityVSAvoidinstallation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal control system that can be installed on various vehicle types without custom modifications. By using the existing air spring pressure system and replacing only the control module and pressure sensor, the system achieves adaptability across different vehicles without requiring vehicle-specific height sensor mounting locations or custom bracket fabrication

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes the need for vehicle-specific height sensor installation infrastructure. By eliminating height sensors and utilizing the existing air spring pressure system, the invention extracts away the installation complexity associated with mounting height sensors on vehicles not originally designed for them, reducing installation to a straightforward component replacement

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Ease of manufacture

If in-line pressure sensors are used for cost-effective pressure measurement, then installation ease is improved, but measurement accuracy deteriorates due to dramatic pressure changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation easeVSAvoidpressure measurement accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses air spring pressure as an intermediary that correlates to suspension height through the vehicle loading conditions. By measuring pressure in the air spring rather than at the manifold, the system obtains measurements that directly reflect the suspension state without the dramatic pressure fluctuations experienced at the air supply interface, thereby maintaining measurement accuracy while keeping the sensor installation simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control where the measured air spring pressure is continuously monitored and used to adjust valve operation. The system opens the valve for a predicted time based on the pressure difference between current and target states, then measures the resulting pressure change. This feedback loop allows the system to adapt to varying vehicle loads and suspension characteristics, maintaining measurement accuracy across different operating conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Device complexity

If conventional pressure-based systems are used without knowing correlation between pressure and height, then system simplicity is maintained, but height control accuracy deteriorates under varying loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidheight control accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary characterization of the vehicle suspension system by mapping the correlation between air spring pressure and suspension height under specific vehicle loading conditions. This pre-established relationship is stored and used during normal operation to translate pressure measurements into accurate height control predictions, enabling precise height control without adding complexity to the real-time control algorithm

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the control parameter from direct height measurement to air spring pressure measurement, which correlates to height through the vehicle loading conditions. By establishing and utilizing the pressure-height correlation for the specific vehicle configuration, the system achieves accurate height control while maintaining simplicity, as pressure sensors are easier to install and more reliable than height sensors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution reduces installation time and costs, improves system robustness, and effectively maintains target suspension heights by tailoring the control system to the vehicle's specific response characteristics and loading conditions, achieving accurate pressure control within a few iterations.

Implementation Method 1

pressure sensor that senses the fluid pressure of the fluid spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure sensing:

Implementation Method 2

valve that selectively controls fluid flow to and from the fluid spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow control:

Implementation Method 3

control circuitry that is operatively coupled to the fluid valve and the pressure sensor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal processing:

Data Source

PatentUS9428022B2System and method for controlling a fluid suspension system
Publication Date: 2016.08.30 AIR ELEVATOR
  • US9428022B2 patent drawing
  • US9428022B2 patent drawing
  • US9428022B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a control system operable to raise and lower the height of a vehicle based in part on the response characteristics of the vehicle's suspension and vehicle loading. The control system may develop a vehicle suspension system response by mapping a correlation between changes in air pressure of air springs in the vehicle's suspension and a test valve-open-time. During operation, the control system may predict a valve-open-time in response to a command relating to a target air pressure for the air springs, and then inflate or deflate one or more of the air springs for a duration substantially equal to the predicted valve-open-time. This process may be iterated until the control system achieves, within an acceptable degree of error, the target air pressure for the one or more air springs.