Air Suspension Level Control with Decoupled Manual and Electrical Pressure Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air suspension systems for commercial vehicles lack the ability to provide both manual and electrical control options for adjusting the vehicle's level, which is essential for loading and unloading operations, as well as maintaining optimal ride height during driving.

Innovation Solution

The system incorporates a raising/lowering valve assembly that generates a first control pressure through manual actuation and an electropneumatic pilot valve that generates a second control pressure, allowing for both manual and electrical control of the level control valve assembly, enabling independent adjustment and regulation of the vehicle's level.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a mechanically actuated level control valve assembly is used with manual raise/lower valve assembly, then manual level adjustment is enabled for loading and unloading operations, but electrical level control capability is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanual level adjustmentVSAvoidelectrical level control capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is divided into separate manual and electrical control paths. The manual raise/lower valve assembly (3) and electropneumatic pilot valve (38) are independent components that each can control the level control valve assembly (22) through separate control pressure lines, allowing both manual and electrical control modes to coexist without interference

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The level control valve assembly (22) is designed to accept control pressure from multiple sources - both the manual raise/lower valve assembly (3) and the electropneumatic pilot valve (38). This multi-functional design allows the same valve assembly to respond to both manual operator input and automated electrical signals, providing versatility in control modes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If control pressures are coupled in series connection, then system complexity is reduced, but throttling effect increases and operational reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidoperational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control pressure system is segmented into parallel independent lines - a first control pressure line from the manual raise/lower valve assembly (3) and a second control pressure line from the electropneumatic pilot valve (38). This segmentation eliminates the throttling effect of series connections while maintaining manageable system complexity through organized parallel architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control pressure lines act as intermediaries that transmit control signals independently from their respective sources to the level control valve assembly (22). This intermediary structure allows both manual and electrical control paths to operate independently without direct interaction, preventing throttling while ensuring reliable signal transmission

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances operational reliability and flexibility by allowing for both manual and electrical level adjustments, improving the vehicle's ride height management during loading/unloading and driving, while reducing the throttling effect and increasing safety by decoupling control pressures.

Implementation Method 1

a raising/lowering valve assembly (3), with which a first control pressure can be generated which is dependent on a manual actuation of the raising/lowering valve (7)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic pressure: Pressure Increase

Implementation Method 2

an electropneumatic pilot valve (38), with which a second control pressure can be generated which is dependent on an electrical control signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectropneumatic conversion: Electromagnet

Implementation Method 3

The level control valve (25) is used to pressurize and/or vent at least one air spring bellows (5a, 5b)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPneumatic actuation: Pressure Increase

Data Source

PatentEP2540537B1Pneumatic spring assembly for a commercial vehicle
Publication Date: 2017.03.22 HALDEX BRAKE PROD AB
  • EP2540537B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2540537B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2540537B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The air-suspension system (1) has a lift-lower valve assembly (3) having lifting-lowering valves (7a,7b), and a level control valve assembly (4) comprising electro-pneumatic servo valves (38a,38b). The lifting-lowering valves and electro-pneumatic servo valves are arranged in parallel line branches and are operated based on primary control pressure value and secondary control pressure value respectively. The air-suspension bags (5a,5b) are operated based on the position of ventilation valve (23) and or shut-off valves (25a,25b) provided in level control valve assembly.