Air Vehicle Navigation Using Crowd-Sourced 3D Obstacle Mapping

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current air vehicles face challenges in navigation and obstacle detection, particularly in complex environments, due to limitations in sensor data processing and real-time obstacle management, which can lead to inefficiencies and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A system that utilizes a network of air vehicles equipped with environmental sensors and edge processors to generate 3D models of their surroundings, crowd-source navigation data, and employ neural networks for obstacle detection and avoidance, enabling efficient and safe flight planning and execution.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If air vehicles use traditional sensor data processing methods, then device complexity is reduced, but navigation efficiency and obstacle detection capability deteriorate in complex environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation efficiencyVSAvoidsensor data processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments sensor data processing by deploying edge processors on individual vehicles to handle local navigation and obstacle detection, while centralized servers manage fleet-wide coordination and map building. This division allows each component to focus on specific tasks, improving overall navigation efficiency without requiring every vehicle to possess full processing capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from traditional 2D map representations to 3D environmental models by integrating data from multiple sensors (LIDAR, cameras, radar) and processing them through neural networks. This dimensional enhancement provides more comprehensive spatial awareness and obstacle detection capability in complex three-dimensional air environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If air vehicles employ comprehensive environmental sensing and real-time processing, then obstacle detection capability improves, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection reliabilityVSAvoidsensor and processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Edge processors serve as intermediaries between raw sensor data and vehicle control systems. These processors pre-process sensor inputs, extract relevant features, and generate navigation commands, reducing the complexity burden on both sensor systems and vehicle control while maintaining high obstacle detection reliability through localized real-time processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data is processed in real-time, navigation decisions are executed, and outcomes are monitored. Neural networks learn from accumulated flight data and sensor feedback, continuously improving obstacle detection accuracy while adapting to reduce processing complexity for common scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If air vehicles operate autonomously with AI systems, then ease of operation improves, but reliability deteriorates due to accidents and missteps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle control easeVSAvoidflight safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Vehicles are equipped with autonomous navigation systems that independently process sensor data, make navigation decisions, and execute flight maneuvers without continuous human intervention. This self-service capability dramatically improves ease of operation while maintaining safety through multiple redundant systems and real-time monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple AI functions (obstacle detection, path planning, vehicle control) into an integrated navigation system. By combining these functions and sharing data across modules, the system achieves more reliable autonomous operation than isolated systems, as the combined system can compensate for individual module limitations and detect anomalies across the full operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enhances navigation efficiency, reduces collision risks, and optimizes flight paths by providing real-time obstacle management and crowd-sourced data integration, improving overall air traffic control and vehicle safety.

Implementation Method 1

Based on LIDAR, radar, and camera images, the system can generate 3D models for navigation purposes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

Based on LIDAR, radar, and camera images, the system can generate 3D models for navigation purposes

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadar: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS11513606B2Air transportation systems and methods
Publication Date: 2022.11.29 TRAN BAO
  • US11513606B2 patent drawing
  • US11513606B2 patent drawing
  • US11513606B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for transporting people using air vehicles.