Airbag Flap Reinforcement Segmentation for Rapid Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing airbag deployment systems in vehicles have a relatively long opening time for the airbag flap, which can delay the protection of vehicle occupants in accidents.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle interior equipment design featuring a reinforcement that is partially spaced from the carrier in the separation zone, allowing for a pivoting movement of the exit flap, with a flexible reinforcement and a Z-shaped fold that includes a melting barrier to prevent integral connection and facilitate faster opening, and position-retaining means like adjustable tear seams to ensure controlled deployment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If the reinforcement is firmly connected to the carrier across the entire surface, then the connection strength is improved, but the opening time of the exit flap increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconnection strengthVSAvoidopening time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The reinforcement is segmented into different connection zones: a first connection zone with strong bonding for structural integrity, and a second connection zone with reduced bonding strength to facilitate faster flap opening. This segmentation allows the reinforcement to provide both strong connection and rapid deployment capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different bonding strengths are applied locally across the reinforcement-carrier interface. The first connection zone has high bonding strength for structural support, while the second connection zone has lower bonding strength to enable quick release during airbag deployment, optimizing both connection strength and opening time locally.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of time

If the reinforcement is spaced from the carrier in the separation zone, then the opening time is reduced, but the connection strength may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveopening timeVSAvoidconnection strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The connection between reinforcement and carrier is segmented into zones with different bonding characteristics. The first connection zone maintains strong bonding for structural integrity, while the second connection zone uses reduced bonding or spacing to enable rapid flap opening without compromising overall connection strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The reinforcement-carrier interface has locally differentiated properties: areas requiring strong connection have full bonding, while areas requiring rapid opening have reduced bonding or spacing. This local quality variation resolves the contradiction between connection strength and opening time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Speed

If a predetermined breaking point is provided in the cladding, then the deployment speed is improved, but the structural integrity of the carrier is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

Predetermined breaking points are pre-formed in the cladding at locations optimized for rapid deployment. These pre-formed weak points allow the cladding to break cleanly and quickly during airbag activation, achieving high deployment speed while maintaining structural integrity in the remaining carrier structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The cladding has locally differentiated properties: predetermined breaking points with reduced strength for rapid deployment, and other areas with full structural integrity. This local quality variation enables fast deployment while preserving overall carrier strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design significantly reduces the opening time of the airbag flap, enhancing the safety of vehicle occupants by ensuring quicker airbag deployment without the risk of the flap being torn off during activation.

Implementation Method 1

a separating agent is introduced into at least one fold of the fold, in particular a Z-shaped fold. The separating means advantageously consists of a flat structure which is preferably impervious to the melt of the carrier material and thus prevents an integral connection of the carrier material with the reinforcement in this area.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting barrier: Melting

Data Source

PatentEP2771211B1Closure for an air bag assembly
Publication Date: 2016.04.27 JOHNSON CONTROLS INTERIORS GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2771211B1 patent drawingFigure 1a~1b
  • EP2771211B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A fixture (1), in particular for the interior of a motor vehicle, is proposed, the fixture having a support (4), wherein the support comprises a pivoting region (41) comprising an outlet flap (3) which can be pivoted upwards, and a fixed region (4"), wherein the fixture (1) is designed in such a manner that the outlet flap (3) remains connected to the fixed region via a hinge (8) upon opening, and wherein the fixed region is connected to the outlet flap via flexible reinforcement (11), characterized in that a separating zone (12) between the pivoting region and the fixed region is provided along the hinge (8), with the reinforcement (11) not being connected in a planar manner to the support in said separating zone (12).