Airbag Fabric Waste Reduction via Segmented Layer Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional air-bag manufacturing methods result in significant fabric wastage due to the 'butterfly' shape cutting technique, which is inefficient and costly.

Innovation Solution

The air-bag is constructed using two rectangular layers cut from the same fabric portion, with specific edge orientations and cut angles to minimize waste, and attached via a single continuous seam, allowing for efficient use of fabric and reduced manufacturing complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If the conventional 'butterfly' shape cutting technique is used to manufacture air-bags, then the air-bags can be formed with the required shape and structure, but significant fabric wastage occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric wastageVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The air-bag is divided into two separate rectangular layers instead of being cut as a single butterfly shape. Each layer is cut independently from the fabric sheet, allowing for more efficient fabric utilization and reduced wastage while maintaining the functional integrity of the air-bag structure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The design transitions from a two-dimensional butterfly shape to a three-dimensional construction using two separate rectangular layers that are folded and joined. This dimensional change enables more efficient fabric cutting patterns and reduces material wastage while achieving the same functional form

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of substance

If multiple air-bag panels are positioned close together on the fabric sheet to minimize waste, then fabric utilization improves, but the manufacturing process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefabric wastageVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the air-bag into two standard rectangular layers, the manufacturing process can use simple, repeatable cutting patterns that allow multiple panels to be efficiently arranged on fabric sheets, reducing waste without significantly increasing process complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Changing the geometric parameters of the air-bag construction from a butterfly shape to two rectangular layers allows for standardized cutting dimensions that optimize fabric utilization while simplifying the manufacturing process through repetition and standardization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Strength

If the air-bag is inflated to a thickness of approximately 100mm across the side protection face, then adequate protection is provided, but the gas volume and inflation pressure requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprotection capabilityVSAvoidgas generator energy
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The air-bag uses flexible fabric layers that can be folded and joined to create the desired thickness profile. This allows the air-bag to achieve the required 100mm protection thickness at the side face while using thinner fabric layers overall, reducing the total gas volume needed for inflation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #30Flexible shells and thin films

Solution Approach 2:

By using folded layers instead of a single thick structure, the air-bag achieves its protective thickness through three-dimensional folding rather than uniform thickness. This dimensional approach reduces the overall gas volume required while maintaining the necessary protection capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP3072753B1An air-bag
Publication Date: 2018.10.24 AUTOLIV DEV AB
  • EP3072753B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3072753B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP3072753B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

An air-bag for use in a vehicle, the air-bag comprising a first layer (12) having a first edge (16) and a second edge (17). The air-bag further comprises a second layer (13) having a third edge (21) and a fourth edge (22). The layers (12, 13) are offset rotationally relative to one another such that the first edge (16) is at an angle A relative to the third edge (21) and a first part (26) of the second layer (13) is superimposed on a first part (27) of the first layer (12) to define a reinforced part (28). A second part (30) of the first layer (12) is folded about a fold line (29) that intersects the first edge (16) and which is substantially at the angle A relative to the first edge (16) so that the second part (31) of the second layer (13) is superimposed on a second part (30) of the first layer (12) to define a chamber (32) therebetween. The layers (12, 13) are attached to one another at least partly around a periphery of the chamber (32) so that the chamber (32) may be inflated by gas provided by a source of gas.