Airborne component extractor with adjustable flow rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fume extraction systems are limited in their ability to effectively draw and remove fumes and smoke from metal working workspaces over a wide area, with a need for improved suction capacity and distance coverage.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a fume extraction system that combines positive airflow with suction airflow, utilizing a hood design with an annular space for radial air flow and adjustable flow rates to enhance the evacuation of airborne components, allowing for greater distance and volume of fume removal.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Volume of moving object

If conventional suction-only systems are used, then the system structure is simple, but the effective capture distance and volume are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffective capture volumeVSAvoidsystem structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines positive airflow (pushing) with negative airflow (suction) into a unified extraction system. The hood simultaneously receives ambient air through inlet openings and draws process air through suction, merging two airflow mechanisms to extend capture distance and volume beyond what conventional suction-only systems can achieve.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The hood is segmented into distinct functional zones: inlet openings for positive airflow, an annular space for radial flow, and suction openings for negative airflow. This segmentation allows each zone to perform its specific function optimally while working together to enhance overall capture effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Volume of moving object

If suction flow rate is increased to expand capture distance, then capture volume improves, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture distanceVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The positive airflow from inlet openings performs preliminary action by pushing airborne components toward the suction zone before the suction force acts on them. This pre-positioning of contaminants closer to the suction openings reduces the suction force and energy required to achieve the same capture distance compared to suction-only systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes pneumatic principles by combining pressurized inlet airflow with suction airflow through the annular space. This dual pneumatic action creates a more efficient airflow pattern that extends capture distance while balancing energy consumption, as the positive and negative pressures work synergistically rather than requiring high suction alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Productivity

If adjustable flow rates are added to optimize performance, then extraction effectiveness improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextraction effectivenessVSAvoidadjustment mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The hood incorporates adjustable inlet openings and variable suction capabilities, transforming a static system into a dynamic one. Users can adjust the positive airflow rate through inlet openings and modify suction flow rate to match different process conditions, workpiece configurations, and contamination levels, thereby optimizing extraction effectiveness for each specific application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system allows parameter changes in airflow rates (both positive and negative) to adapt to different operational requirements. By varying flow rates, the system can optimize capture effectiveness for different distances, workpiece geometries, and contaminant types, making the extraction process adaptable rather than fixed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly enhances the capture of airborne components such as smoke, fumes, and particulate matter, enabling effective removal at greater distances and volumes compared to conventional systems, with adjustable flow rates optimizing performance.

Implementation Method 1

a blower delivers a positive pressure air flow to a hood that creates a radial air flow pattern

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPositive pressure air flow: Pressure Gradient

Implementation Method 2

draws negative pressure air flow from a workspace through inlet openings

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectNegative pressure air flow (suction): Suction

Data Source

PatentEP2825324B1Airborne component extractor with adjustable flow rates
Publication Date: 2020.11.04 ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS INC
  • EP2825324B1 patent drawingFigure 1~1B
  • EP2825324B1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2
  • EP2825324B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A extraction system is designed for metal working and other applications. The system may comprise a cart-type base or may be incorporated into a fixed or semi-fixed installation. A blower delivers a positive pressure airflow to a hood that creates an air region by directing the air through an annular space between inner and outer shrouds, impacting the air against a single generally perpendicular flange. Return air from the operation may be mixed with fresh air, both of which may be filtered, to supply the positive pressure air. Both air streams to and from the hood may be adjusted to optimize operation. Adjustments may be made at the base unit or remotely.