Airborne Radar Antenna Pointing Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Airborne radars operating at high altitudes face challenges in maintaining continuous coverage of a ground area without discontinuity in detection, as existing methods fail to accurately account for radar range limitations and beam aperture variations, leading to underestimated or overestimated swath widths and non-contiguous sub-swaths.

Innovation Solution

A method that calculates the antenna elevation and pointing distances to optimize sub-swath coverage by using a criterion that accounts for atmospheric losses, antenna gains, and radar waveforms, ensuring continuous detection with minimal overlap between pointing operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a purely geometrical approach using the 3 dB aperture is used to calculate sub-swath positions, then the calculation is simple, but the estimation of the actually usable swath is falsified and continuity of detection cannot be ensured

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of calculationVSAvoidaccuracy of swath width estimation
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter used for swath calculation from a fixed geometrical 3 dB aperture to a dynamic effective aperture that varies with distance. The effective aperture is calculated based on the radar range equation, taking into account atmospheric losses, antenna gains, and minimum detectable signal levels at different distances, thereby accurately reflecting the actually usable swath width at each range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of operation

If the beam aperture width at 3 dB is used at short distances, then the calculation is straightforward, but the swath width is underestimated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of calculationVSAvoidswath width coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the effective aperture a dynamic parameter that changes with distance from the radar. Instead of using a fixed 3 dB beam width, the effective aperture is continuously adjusted based on the radar range equation, atmospheric conditions, and target detectability requirements at each specific distance, ensuring accurate swath width estimation across the entire range

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Area of stationary object

If multiple pointing operations are performed to cover the area of interest, then the coverage is improved, but the number of operations increases and overlap becomes excessive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage areaVSAvoidnumber of pointing operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-calculating the effective aperture and usable swath width at each distance using the radar range equation before performing pointing operations. This allows the system to determine the optimal number and positioning of pointing operations in advance, ensuring continuous coverage with minimal overlap by knowing exactly how far each pointing operation will effectively cover

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Device complexity

If the geometrical criterion is used to estimate swath width, then the method is simple to implement, but the limit of the radar range is not taken into account and the swath is overestimated at great distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomplexity of the methodVSAvoidaccuracy of swath estimation at long range
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies feedback by using the radar range equation to continuously evaluate the actual detectability of targets at different distances. The effective aperture is adjusted based on feedback from atmospheric loss models, antenna gain patterns, and minimum detectable signal levels, ensuring that the estimated swath width accurately reflects the radar's actual capability at each range, preventing overestimation at great distances

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11474229B2Method for optimizing the pointing of an antenna of an airborne radar system
Publication Date: 2022.10.18 THALES SA
  • US11474229B2 patent drawing
  • US11474229B2 patent drawing
  • US11474229B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for optimizing the elevational pointing of an antenna of an airborne radar system at an altitude h includes an antenna and processing and calculation means, the method comprising: a. selecting an area of interest b. calculating atmospheric losses Lref at a reference altitude href at the reference range Dref and calculating a reference criterion Kref=−40 log10 (Dref); c. for each possible elevational pointing distance of the antenna Dpt from the area of interest, calculating the antenna elevation S that makes it possible to target the distance Dpt via the centre of the antenna; d. for each distance D from the region of interest, calculating the angle θ at which the antenna observes the point of the ground at the distance D and calculating a criterion; 1. K(D)=Ge(θ)+Gr(θ)−40 log10 D+Lref(href,Dref)−Latmo(h,D) 2. where Ge(θ),Gr(θ) are respectively the gains of the antenna that are normalized at emission and at reception; e. calculating all of the distances D that, for this pointing distance Dpt, satisfy the relationship K(D)>Kref so as to obtain the start and the end of the sub-swath actually able to be used by the radar system; and calculating the actually usable sub-swaths that are to be juxtaposed (A, B, C) in order to cover the whole of the area of interest without discontinuities.