Aircraft Flight Control With Online Actuator Mix Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing flight control systems face challenges in determining the optimal combination of actuators and associated parameters to achieve desired forces and moments in real-time, as they often rely on pre-computed solutions that cannot account for all possible conditions and circumstances, leading to inefficiencies and potential saturation issues.

Innovation Solution

An online optimization system that models costs and constraints in real-time to determine an optimal mix of actuators and parameters, using techniques such as bounded-variable least-squares to minimize a cost function and enforce linear constraints, allowing for dynamic adjustment based on current aircraft state and conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If pre-computed solutions are used to determine actuator combinations, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidadaptability to flight conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static pre-computed solutions to dynamic real-time optimization. The flight control system continuously solves optimization problems online to determine actuator combinations based on current flight conditions, aircraft state, and pilot inputs, enabling adaptation to changing circumstances while maintaining manageable complexity through efficient algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being optimized from fixed pre-computed values to dynamically adjusted actuator commands. By formulating the problem as an online optimization task that adjusts actuator parameters in real-time based on current conditions, the system achieves both adaptability and computational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If online optimization is implemented to improve adaptability, then computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to flight conditionsVSAvoidcomputational power required
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements partial optimization by focusing computational efforts on the most critical aspects of flight control. Rather than optimizing all possible parameters simultaneously, the system targets key actuator combinations and flight parameters, achieving sufficient adaptability with reduced computational burden through selective optimization of essential control variables.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Manufacturing precision

If more actuators are used to achieve desired forces and moments, then control precision improves, but risk of actuator saturation increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidactuator saturation risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The optimization system incorporates feedback about actuator states and constraints into the real-time decision-making process. By continuously monitoring actuator positions, rates, and saturation margins, the system adjusts actuator commands to achieve precise control while preventing saturation, using the optimization framework to balance precision requirements against reliability constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11034441B2Online optimization-based flight control system
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 WISK AERO LLC
  • US11034441B2 patent drawing
  • US11034441B2 patent drawing
  • US11034441B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques to control flight of an aircraft are disclosed. In various embodiments, a set of inputs associated with a requested set of forces and moments to be applied to the aircraft is received. An optimal mix of actuators and associated actuator parameters to achieve to an extent practical the requested forces and moments is determined, including by minimizing a weighted set of costs that includes costs associated with one or more errors each corresponding to a difference between a requested force or moment and a corresponding force or moment achieved by the computed solution.