Aircraft Anomalous Data Transmission via Adaptive Wireless Modes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional methods for downloading surveillance incident data from aircraft systems are costly, time-consuming, and prone to introducing malware, and require physical connection, whereas existing patents focus on obstacle detection and weather information transmission without addressing data completeness, integrity, and security in a comprehensive manner.

Innovation Solution

An automated system that detects anomalous incidents on aircraft and determines the availability of efficient wireless transmission modes such as Gatelink, Wi-Fi, or SatCom to transmit relevant data to an off-aircraft system, ensuring data completeness, integrity, and security, and selecting transmission modes based on priority and availability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated wireless transmission is implemented, then productivity and efficiency are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission efficiencyVSAvoidtransmission system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple transmission mode capabilities (SatCom, VHF, HF, data link) into a single automated transmission system. The processing device automatically selects and switches between different transmission modes based on aircraft status and data priority, making the system universally adaptable to various transmission conditions without requiring separate manual systems for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The transmission system operates autonomously by automatically detecting anomalous incidents, determining data priority levels, selecting appropriate transmission modes, and executing transmissions without requiring manual intervention from airline personnel. The system monitors its own operational status and self-adjusts transmission parameters based on available communication resources and aircraft conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If all anomalous incident data is transmitted immediately, then data completeness is improved, but loss of energy increases due to continuous transmission modes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata completenessVSAvoidtransmission energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes transmission parameters including mode selection (SatCom, VHF, HF, data link), transmission timing, and data priority levels based on aircraft status, incident severity, and energy availability. High-priority data triggers immediate transmission while lower-priority data is deferred to energy-efficient modes when appropriate, optimizing the balance between data completeness and energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of continuous transmission, the system employs periodic status monitoring and conditional transmission triggers. The processing device periodically assesses aircraft status and incident data, initiating transmission only when anomalous incidents are detected or when energy-efficient opportunities arise, thereby reducing unnecessary energy consumption while maintaining data completeness through systematic periodic checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Reliability

If physical connection methods are used, then data security is improved, but loss of time increases due to scheduling requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata securityVSAvoiddata retrieval time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces physical mechanical connection methods with wireless transmission technologies (SatCom, VHF, HF, data link). This substitution eliminates the need for physical access to aircraft systems, removing the scheduling constraints and time losses associated with manual connection while maintaining data security through encrypted wireless communication protocols and authenticated transmission channels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary automated data collection and preparation during flight operations. When anomalous incidents occur, data is immediately captured and prepared for transmission in advance, eliminating the need for post-flight manual data retrieval. This preliminary action ensures data security through controlled automated access while significantly reducing the time required for data acquisition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If automated transmission systems are deployed, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata transmission operationVSAvoidautomated system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The automated transmission system performs all operational tasks autonomously including incident detection, data identification, transmission mode selection, and execution. The processing device self-manages the entire transmission workflow without requiring operator intervention, simplifying ease of operation to a single automated process while the internal complexity is managed through integrated system architecture that combines multiple functions into unified control logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentEP3086304B1Automated transmission of aircraft anomalous incident data via preferred transmission modes
Publication Date: 2019.05.08 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP3086304B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3086304B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3086304B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

This disclosure is directed to techniques for automated transmission of surveillance incident data or other anomalous incident data from an aircraft via a preferred transmission mode. An example method includes detecting, by a processing device onboard an aircraft, an anomalous incident involving the aircraft that qualifies for reporting relative to a set of anomalous incident reporting criteria. The method further includesidentifying, by the processing device, data onboard the aircraft relevant to the anomalous incident. The method further includes detecting that the aircraft is in a status that makes available a selected data transmission mode for transmitting the data relevant to the anomalous incident. The method further includes communicating the data relevant to the anomalous incident to a transmission system for transmission from the aircraft via the selected data transmission mode in response to detecting that the aircraft is in the status that makes available the selected data transmission mode.