Aircraft Autopilot Control Using Sliding Mode and Feedback Linearization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft control systems face challenges in efficiently managing nonlinear dynamics across the entire operating envelope, requiring complex and costly parameter scheduling, and often fail to adapt to variations in flight conditions and aircraft configurations.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a combination of sliding mode control and feedback linearization techniques to compute target rates for bank, heading, and altitude control, using threshold-based functions and sigmoid mappings to adjust control inputs dynamically, thereby reducing the need for manual tuning and enhancing adaptability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If parameter scheduling is used to achieve desired performance across the entire operating envelope, then control performance is improved, but system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol performanceVSAvoidparameter scheduling complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the control approach from scheduling multiple parameters across different operating conditions to using a single unified feedback linearization controller that adapts to varying flight conditions through real-time state feedback. This eliminates the need for complex parameter scheduling while maintaining control performance across the entire operating envelope.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The feedback linearization controller serves as a universal control solution that handles all flight conditions and configurations simultaneously, rather than requiring separate parameter schedules for different operating regimes. The controller universally manages nonlinear dynamics, coupling effects, and configuration transitions through a single control law.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If linearization about a nominal operating point is used, then control system design is simplified, but adaptability to nonlinear dynamics and varying flight conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system designVSAvoidadaptability to nonlinear dynamics
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of linearizing aircraft dynamics about a nominal operating point with a mathematical transformation approach using feedback linearization. This substitution allows the controller to handle the full nonlinear dynamics exactly, rather than approximating them, while maintaining a relatively simple control structure through state-space transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If manual tuning of control parameters is performed, then control precision can be optimized, but time and cost consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidtuning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback linearization controller is self-tuning in the sense that it automatically adapts to the aircraft's actual dynamics through real-time state feedback without requiring manual intervention. The control law inherently compensates for parameter variations and modeling uncertainties, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual tuning processes while maintaining optimal control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20250341839A1Aircraft control systems and methods using sliding mode control and feedback linearization
Publication Date: 2025.11.06 BOMBARDIER INC
  • US20250341839A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341839A1 patent drawing
  • US20250341839A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for controlling a bank angle, a heading angle and an altitude of an aircraft during flight are provided. The methods and systems disclosed herein make use of sliding mode control and feedback linearization control (nonlinear dynamic control) techniques. The methods and systems can provide autopilot-type functions that can autonomously execute aggressive maneuvers as well as more gentle maneuvers for aircraft.