Aircraft Boarding Wave System Reducing Congestion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current boarding methods are inefficient, leading to prolonged boarding times, passenger congestion, and discomfort, as they fail to account for space occupied by passengers in aisles and do not provide intuitive guidance, resulting in delays and poor passenger experience.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that organize passengers into sequential waves based on the number of passengers and available seats, considering space occupied in the aircraft aisles, using a virtual guide that adapts to passenger movement, allowing for counterflow boarding and ensuring sufficient space for settling, thereby reducing confrontation and optimizing boarding efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional boarding methods are used, then passengers can board the aircraft, but boarding time is prolonged and passenger congestion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboarding speedVSAvoidboarding time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The boarding process is divided into sequential waves, with each wave containing multiple groups of passengers. Groups are further segmented by row assignments (e.g., rows 1-5 in first wave, rows 6-10 in second wave). This segmentation allows controlled flow of passengers through the aircraft, preventing congestion while maintaining continuous boarding operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Passengers are pre-assigned to specific groups and waves before boarding begins. The system calculates optimal group assignments based on aircraft configuration, passenger count, and aisle space requirements. This preliminary organization eliminates on-the-spot decision-making and streamlines the boarding process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If passengers are grouped closely together, then boarding efficiency increases, but aisle space becomes insufficient for settling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboarding efficiencyVSAvoidaisle space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The wave structure dynamically adjusts based on real-time conditions. Each wave is designed to occupy a specific number of passengers that can be accommodated in the available aisle space. The system calculates wave sizes considering aircraft type, aisle width, and passenger settling requirements, allowing optimal utilization of aisle space without overcrowding.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Boarding occurs in periodic waves with defined intervals. Each wave completes its boarding and settling process before the next wave begins. This periodic structure ensures that aisle space is cleared and replenished in a controlled manner, maintaining sufficient space for passenger movement and settling while sustaining continuous boarding operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Adaptability or versatility

If manual updates are used for boarding instructions, then the system can adapt to boarding conditions, but labor demand increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveboarding condition adaptationVSAvoidmanual operation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically calculates wave formations, group assignments, and timing based on input parameters (aircraft type, passenger count, aisle configuration). The algorithm self-adjusts to different boarding scenarios without requiring manual intervention. Ground staff simply need to input basic parameters, and the system generates the complete boarding plan autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual calculation and adjustment of boarding groups is replaced by an automated computational system. The algorithm processes boarding conditions and generates optimized wave structures, eliminating the need for manual counting, grouping, and instruction updates. This substitution reduces labor demand while maintaining adaptability to various boarding scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12060169B2Method and system for passenger information, organization, leading, boarding and settling in aircrafts, equipment and computer programs therefor
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 POCAI RICARDO
  • US12060169B2 patent drawing
  • US12060169B2 patent drawing
  • US12060169B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a method characterized in that one or more passenger waves having a size corresponding to the number of passengers in the settling process, who may be standing at the same time in an aircraft aisle. The invention also relates to a system and equipment capable of performing a method according to the invention, in addition to corresponding computer programs.