Aircraft Flight Boundary Control Using Dynamic Movement Limits

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Determining permissible flight boundaries for aircraft is challenging due to the numerous factors that need consideration, including pilot identity, experience, and environmental conditions, which can lead to pilot error and inexperience.

Innovation Solution

A flight controller system that determines flight boundaries based on aircraft-specific data, including pilot identity and experience, generates movement limits, and generates control signals to maintain these boundaries using a thrust envelope, incorporating sensors and a propulsor component to control aircraft movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If flight boundaries are determined considering multiple factors (pilot identity, experience, environmental conditions), then safety and precision are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the flight boundary determination into distinct modules: a flight boundary determination module that processes multiple factors (pilot identity, experience, environmental conditions) to establish initial boundaries, and a movement limit setting module that applies specific limit values. This segmentation allows complex safety considerations to be handled in organized, manageable sections without overwhelming the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flight controller acts as an intermediary between the pilot control system and the aircraft propulsion system. It receives thrust envelope instructions from the pilot control, processes them through flight boundary determination algorithms that consider multiple safety factors, and generates appropriate control signals. This intermediary role manages system complexity by centralizing the decision-making logic in a dedicated controller that coordinates all safety-related operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If flight boundaries are strictly controlled to prevent pilot error, then safety is improved, but operational flexibility deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic flight boundary adjustment by allowing the flight controller to modify movement limits and thrust envelope parameters in real-time based on current flight conditions, pilot inputs, and environmental factors. The flight boundary determination module continuously updates permissible flight regions, enabling the system to maintain strict safety control while adapting to changing operational requirements throughout the flight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key parameters such as thrust envelope limits, speed restrictions, and altitude boundaries dynamically during flight. The flight controller adjusts these parameters based on the aircraft's current state, pilot experience level, and environmental conditions, allowing strict safety control through parameter management while maintaining operational flexibility through continuous parameter adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If real-time updates to flight boundaries are implemented, then operational efficiency is improved, but computational requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight boundary determination module performs preliminary calculations of permissible flight boundaries before critical flight phases occur. By pre-determining safe flight regions based on pilot credentials, aircraft performance data, and forecasted environmental conditions, the system reduces real-time computational requirements while maintaining operational efficiency during actual flight execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the flight controller monitors actual flight parameters, compares them against determined flight boundaries, and generates corrective control signals when approaching limits. This feedback mechanism enables real-time operational efficiency by automatically adjusting control inputs based on boundary constraints, reducing the need for complex real-time recalculation while maintaining strict adherence to safety boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12399507B2Systems and methods for controlling a flight boundary of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 BETA AIR LLC
  • US12399507B2 patent drawing
  • US12399507B2 patent drawing
  • US12399507B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling a flight boundary of an aircraft. The system includes a flight controller communicatively connected to the aircraft. The flight controller is configured to receive a plurality of flight data linked with the aircraft, determine a flight boundary for the aircraft as a function of the plurality of flight data, set an aircraft movement limit as a function of the flight boundary, receive a thrust envelope, and generate a control signal for the aircraft as a function of the aircraft movement limit and the thrust envelope. The control signal is limits the aircraft to remain within the flight boundary. A method for controlling a flight boundary of an aircraft is also provided.