Aircraft Brake Cooling via Dynamic Airflow Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional aircraft brake temperature monitoring systems do not account for desired turnaround time and environmental effects, leading to either excessive or insufficient cooling time, which can result in brake damage or unnecessary wear.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that determine a turnaround time parameter and a time to cool parameter, adjusting air flow directed at the brake system based on the difference between these parameters to equilibrate the brake temperature with a reference temperature, using a variable speed fan to optimize cooling.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a fixed period of time is specified between landing and subsequent takeoff, then brake cooling time is guaranteed, but the aircraft may experience unnecessary ground time or insufficient cooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake cooling adequacyVSAvoidground time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from a static fixed-time cooling approach to a dynamic adaptive cooling system that continuously monitors brake temperature and adjusts cooling duration in real-time. The controller modifies air flow duration based on actual temperature measurements, allowing the cooling period to vary dynamically between 0-30 minutes depending on initial brake temperature, ambient conditions, and desired turnaround time, thus eliminating unnecessary ground time while ensuring adequate cooling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where temperature sensors continuously monitor brake temperature, the controller processes this data alongside ambient temperature and desired turnaround time, and adjusts the air flow duration accordingly. This feedback loop enables real-time optimization of cooling duration, preventing both over-cooling (wasted time) and under-cooling (safety risk) by constantly comparing actual temperature against target thresholds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If brakes are allowed to cool to below dispatch temperature, then brake reliability is improved, but unnecessary wear of rotors and stators occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrake system reliabilityVSAvoidbrake component wear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the target temperature parameter based on operational context. Instead of always cooling to a fixed low temperature, the controller calculates an optimal target temperature that prevents overheating during rejected takeoff while avoiding excessive cooling that causes wear. The system modifies cooling duration and intensity parameters in real-time based on initial temperature, ambient conditions, and desired turnaround time, achieving reliability without unnecessary wear

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If conventional temperature monitoring systems are used, then temperature data is provided, but turnaround time optimization is not achieved

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetemperature monitoringVSAvoidturnaround time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enhances conventional temperature monitoring by adding a closed-loop feedback control mechanism. Temperature sensors continuously provide data to the controller, which processes this information along with ambient temperature and desired turnaround time to dynamically adjust air flow duration. This feedback system transforms static temperature data into actionable cooling control, optimizing turnaround time by precisely matching cooling duration to actual brake cooling rates

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary calculations of required cooling duration based on initial brake temperature, ambient conditions, and desired turnaround time before initiating cooling. This preliminary action allows the system to pre-determine optimal cooling parameters, enabling faster turnaround by avoiding unnecessary cooling time while ensuring the brakes will be sufficiently cool by the desired departure time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Ensures the brake system cools to a safe dispatch temperature for takeoff while minimizing wear, preventing overheating during rejected takeoffs and overcooling during taxiing, thereby extending brake life and reducing oxidation.

Implementation Method 1

adjusting a flow of air directed at the brake system based on the parameter difference

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForced Convection: Forced Convection

Data Source

PatentEP3805060B1Brake temperature and turnaround time estimation systems and methods
Publication Date: 2022.08.24 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3805060B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3805060B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3805060B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A method for cooling a brake system is disclosed. In various embodiments, the method includes determining (362) a turnaround time parameter; determining (364) a time to cool parameter; determining (366) a parameter difference between the time to cool parameter and the turnaround time parameter; and adjusting a flow of air directed at the brake system based on the parameter difference.