Aircraft Brake Junction Box Layout for Reduced Wiring Mass

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The centralized architecture of aircraft electric braking systems results in bulky, heavy, and costly harnesses due to numerous electrical wires, increasing the mass and complexity of the braking system.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a junction box to pool control signals and reduce the number of cables between the aircraft fuselage and brakes, integrating digital processing means to manage control signals and power distribution, thereby reducing the number of components and harnesses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a centralized architecture is used with multiple electromechanical actuators connected to a single computer, then control functionality is consolidated, but the number of electrical wires and harnesses increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol architectureVSAvoidnumber of electrical wires
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the braking control into independent modular units, each brake assembly having its own control electronics and power conversion components. This segmentation allows each module to be self-contained, reducing the need for extensive wiring between central computer and individual actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each brake assembly is designed as a universal module that integrates multiple functions: electromechanical actuation, control signal processing, power conversion, and diagnostic capabilities. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated components and wiring for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If numerous electrical wires are used to connect actuators to the computer, then control signals and power can be transmitted, but the mass and volume of the braking system increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol signal transmissionVSAvoidmass of braking system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control electronics and power conversion components are merged into integrated units located at each brake assembly. This combining of functions eliminates the need for separate wiring harnesses for control signals and power transmission, reducing overall system mass.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Local control electronics serve as intermediaries between the flight control system and the electromechanical actuators. These intermediaries process control signals locally and manage power distribution, reducing the need for direct high-power wiring connections to the central computer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If common mode current filtering circuits are integrated into computers, then electromagnetic interference is reduced, but the mass, complexity and cost of the computer increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectromagnetic interferenceVSAvoidcomputer system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The filtering and electromagnetic interference protection functions are extracted from the central computer and placed at the brake assembly level. This extraction reduces the complexity and mass requirements of the central computer while maintaining EMI protection capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

Each brake assembly is equipped with its own filtering and protection circuits that serve the local module independently. This self-service approach allows each module to protect itself from electromagnetic interference without requiring complex centralized filtering systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Power

If bulky harnesses with long power supply wires are used, then sufficient power can be delivered to actuators, but the system mass and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower delivery capabilityVSAvoidharness complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Power conversion and regulation are performed locally at each brake assembly before power is delivered to the actuator. This preliminary action of converting and regulating power at the point of use eliminates the need for long high-power wiring runs from the aircraft fuselage to each brake.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the electrical parameters (voltage, current) locally at each brake assembly using integrated power conversion electronics. This allows flexible power delivery to actuators without requiring heavy-gauge wires capable of handling high currents over long distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4091935B1Architecture of an aircraft braking system
Publication Date: 2025.06.25 SAFRAN LANDING SYSTEMS
  • EP4091935B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP4091935B1 patent drawingFigure 4~6
  • EP4091935B1 patent drawingFigure 7

AI summary

Aircraft braking system architecture, comprising: - a brake (300) including friction elements and electromechanical actuators (303) to exert a braking torque on the wheel; - a computer (301) located in the aircraft fuselage and arranged to produce first piloting signals; - a junction box (302) located on the landing gear, the junction box being connected to the computer and the electromechanical actuators, the junction box being arranged to receive the first piloting signals, the junction box including electrical processing means arranged to produce, from the first piloting signals, second piloting signals for the electromechanical actuators to control the electromechanical actuators.