Aircraft Cargo Locking Latch with Mechanical Safety Trigger

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing longitudinal lock devices for cargo in aircraft face issues with non-uniform loading during cargo drop, leading to premature release and stability problems due to mechanical or electro-mechanical failures, which can result in reduced accuracy and potential aircraft stall.

Innovation Solution

A longitudinal lock device with a four-bar mechanism and a safety trigger that mechanically releases the lock when a certain force is attained, ensuring cargo release without locking issues, featuring a locking box with a bar mechanism and a rocker with a contact face to displace a compression bar under longitudinal force, and an adjustable rod connected to a compression helical spring cartridge.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a purely mechanical release system is used, then the lock can release automatically when force is applied, but non-uniform loading causes premature release and sequential release of locks

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic releaseVSAvoiduniform release
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-adjusting the spring force in each lock device before the cargo drop. The spring force is set to a predetermined value that ensures all locks will release simultaneously when the extraction parachute deploys, preventing premature release due to non-uniform loading during the drop sequence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of spring force in each lock device to a predetermined value that is optimized for simultaneous release. This parameter adjustment ensures that even under non-uniform loading conditions, all locks reach their release threshold at the same moment when the extraction force is applied.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If electro-mechanical systems are used to adjust release force, then release force can be precisely controlled, but system complexity increases and failure risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelease force controlVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the electro-mechanical control systems and replaces them with purely mechanical spring-based force adjustment mechanisms. This simplification maintains precise release force control through mechanical means while eliminating the complexity and failure risks associated with electro-mechanical components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes electro-mechanical control systems with a purely mechanical spring-based system. The spring force is adjusted mechanically to achieve precise release force control, eliminating the need for electrical actuators and sensors while maintaining manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If locks are released individually, then each lock can be controlled independently, but non-uniform loading causes sequential release and cargo instability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual lock controlVSAvoidcargo stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by pre-configuring all locks with identical spring force settings before the cargo drop. This ensures that when the extraction parachute deploys and applies force to the cargo, all locks simultaneously reach their release threshold at the same moment, maintaining cargo stability during the release process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates equipotentiality by setting the spring force parameter to a predetermined value in all lock devices. This ensures that all locks have equal release thresholds and will activate simultaneously under uniform extraction force, preventing sequential release and maintaining cargo stability during the drop.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #12Equipotentiality

4Reliability

If a hydraulic pre-equalization system is used, then uniform loading of locks is achieved, but aircraft weight and floor space increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuniform loadingVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the hydraulic pre-equalization system from the lock device assembly. Instead of using a complex hydraulic network to equalize loading, the patent achieves uniform release through individual mechanical spring adjustment of each lock, eliminating the need for hydraulic pipes and associated components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent substitutes the hydraulic pre-equalization system with a purely mechanical spring-based adjustment system for each lock. This mechanical approach achieves uniform loading and simultaneous release without requiring the weight-intensive hydraulic infrastructure that occupies aircraft floor space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution ensures uniform cargo release and prevents aircraft instability by mechanically releasing the lock when a failure is detected, maintaining stability and accuracy during cargo drop, and avoiding the retention of cargo inside the aircraft.

Implementation Method 1

an adjustable rod connected to a compression helical spring cartridge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

a rocker with a contact face to displace a compression bar under longitudinal force

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS10507919B2Longitudinal lock device for cargo in aircraft, safety trigger for longitudinal lock device
Publication Date: 2019.12.17 EMBRAER SA
  • US10507919B2 patent drawing
  • US10507919B2 patent drawing
  • US10507919B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Longitudinal lock devices for cargo in aircraft having a locking box fastened beneath the floor of an aircraft include a locking latch connectable to the cargo and coupled to a bar mechanism disposed inside the locking box. The locking latch is moveable in a direction towards extraction of the cargo in flight. The bar mechanism is fixed to the locking box and includes a puppet arm articulated on a second pivot wand a puppet follower articulated on a first pivot, whereby each of the pivots is operably fastened to the locking box (9). The puppet arm comprises a cam profile on a face there of which is cooperative with a puppet roller connected to an electro-mechanical actuator linear by means of a drive rod. The articulations moving the bar mechanism responsively determine locked, armed and released positions for the device.