Aircraft Cargo Handling Architecture for Precise Load Positioning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cargo handling systems for aircraft lack efficient and automated methods for storing and restraining cargo during transportation, relying on manual operation and limited automation for precise positioning and restraint.

Innovation Solution

A cargo handling system incorporating a network of power drive units (PDUs) and agent-based control systems that utilize motorized drive rollers and restraint devices, controlled by a system controller and individual unit controllers, to automate the movement and restraint of cargo units, enabling precise positioning and secure storage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operation and limited automation are used for cargo handling, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and precision of cargo positioning are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo handling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cargo handling system is divided into multiple independent PDUs, each with its own controller. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high productivity through coordinated operation of multiple units while keeping each individual unit relatively simple in structure, thus resolving the contradiction between system-level productivity and component-level complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each PDU is designed as a universal module capable of multiple functions: driving cargo units, positioning them precisely, and restraining them when needed. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate specialized devices, thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If automated control systems are implemented for precise cargo positioning, then manufacturing precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo positioning precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into distributed controllers, each managing a specific PDU. This segmentation enables precise local control of cargo positioning at each PDU while avoiding the need for a single complex centralized control system, thus achieving high positioning precision without proportionally increasing overall control system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each PDU controller incorporates feedback mechanisms to monitor and adjust cargo position in real-time. This feedback control enables high positioning precision through continuous adjustment based on actual position data, while the distributed nature of the feedback systems keeps individual controller complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system enhances the efficiency and automation of cargo handling by enabling precise control over cargo movement and restraint, reducing manual labor and improving the safety and efficiency of cargo transportation and storage within aircraft cargo compartments.

Implementation Method 1

Motor driven rollers are typically employed in these systems

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic conversion: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

restraint is configured to normally assume a retracted condition at which cargo movement proximate to the restraint is permitted and to selectively assume an erected condition at which cargo movement proximate to the restraint is inhibited by the restraint

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentEP3653504B1Aircraft cargo handling system architecture
Publication Date: 2025.01.01 GOODRICH CORP
  • EP3653504B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP3653504B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP3653504B1 patent drawingFigure 2

AI summary

A cargo handling system is disclosed. In various embodiments, the cargo handling system includes a conveyance surface; a first power drive unit having a first drive roller; a first restraint device; one or more sensors configured to provide positional data corresponding to a current location of a unit load device on the conveyance surface; and a first power drive unit agent configured for communication with the one or more sensors, the first power drive unit agent configured to selectively activate and deactivate the first drive roller and the first restraint device based on the positional data.