Aircraft Cargo Handling Architecture With Sensor-Guided Restraint

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cargo handling systems for aircraft lack efficient and automated methods for transporting and restraining cargo, relying on manual operation and limited automation, which can lead to inefficiencies and increased operational costs.

Innovation Solution

A cargo handling system that incorporates power drive units with drive rollers and restraint devices, controlled by agents communicating with sensors to automate the movement and storage of cargo units, utilizing a wireless network and power communication buses for coordinated operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual operation and limited automation are used in cargo handling systems, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity and operational efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo handling efficiencyVSAvoidsystem automation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The cargo handling system is divided into multiple independent power drive units, each equipped with its own agent controller that autonomously manages local operations. This segmentation allows the system to achieve high automation and productivity while keeping individual controller complexity manageable, as each agent handles only its local PDU operations independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each power drive unit agent autonomously monitors sensor data, determines when cargo is properly positioned, and controls its associated drive rollers and restraint devices without requiring constant central control. This self-service capability enables automated cargo handling while reducing overall system complexity through distributed intelligence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If automated power drive units with sensor integration are implemented, then productivity and precision are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo placement precisionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors continuously monitor cargo position and provide feedback to the power drive unit agents. The agents use this feedback to determine when cargo has reached the desired position and to control the timing of restraint device activation, achieving precise cargo placement through closed-loop control while maintaining simple individual agent logic

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system activates restraint devices immediately when sensors detect that cargo has reached the proper position, before any potential misalignment or displacement can occur. This preliminary action ensures precise cargo placement by securing it at the exact target position without requiring complex positioning algorithms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple power drive units with independent agents are used, then cargo handling flexibility and adaptability are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecargo transport flexibilityVSAvoidmulti-unit coordination complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses multiple independent power drive units, each with its own agent controller that autonomously manages local operations. This segmentation allows the system to adapt to different cargo configurations and transport scenarios while keeping individual controller complexity manageable, as each agent handles only its local PDU operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each power drive unit agent is designed with universal functionality to handle various cargo types and transport scenarios. The agents can independently control drive rollers and restraint devices for different cargo configurations, providing system versatility without requiring complex specialized controllers for each unit

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12091191B2Aircraft cargo handling system architecture
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 GOODRICH CORP
  • US12091191B2 patent drawing
  • US12091191B2 patent drawing
  • US12091191B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A cargo handling system includes a conveyance surface; a first power drive unit having a first drive roller, a first restraint device; one or more sensors configured to provide positional data corresponding to a current location of a unit load device on the conveyance surface; and a first power drive unit agent configured for communication with the one or more sensors, the first power drive unit agent configured to selectively activate and deactivate the first drive roller and the first restraint device based on the positional data.