Aircraft Classifier Testing With Scenario-Based Error Categorization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Developing aircraft control systems with trained classifiers is complex and time-consuming, and identifying errors in their unexpected behavior is difficult due to lack of transparency, necessitating improved methods for evaluating and categorizing errors in these systems.

Innovation Solution

A test apparatus and method using scenario data and a graph model to evaluate trained classifiers, generating error categorization data that identifies and categorizes errors in aircraft systems, allowing for efficient troubleshooting and rapid development.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If trained classifiers are used to control aircraft systems, then development time may be decreased, but it becomes difficult to determine the cause of unexpected behavior and ensure sufficient trust in the system

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevelopment timeVSAvoiderror identification difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the error analysis process by categorizing errors into distinct types (configuration errors, data errors, classifier errors, etc.). This segmentation allows developers to identify and address specific error sources in trained classifiers, making the previously opaque error detection process structured and manageable while maintaining the productivity benefits of using trained classifiers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary testing system that acts as a mediator between the trained classifier and the aircraft system. This intermediary captures and analyzes classifier outputs, generating error categorization data that reveals the internal state and decision-making process of the trained classifier, thereby enabling error detection without requiring modification of the classifier itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional error detection methods are used for trained classifiers, then system reliability may be maintained, but troubleshooting and development efficiency are significantly reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem reliabilityVSAvoidtroubleshooting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary error categorization by analyzing classifier outputs during testing phases before deployment. Error categorization data is generated in advance, identifying potential issues with configuration, input data, or classifier behavior. This preliminary analysis establishes a foundation for rapid troubleshooting while maintaining system reliability through thorough pre-deployment validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where error categorization results are fed back to developers to guide troubleshooting efforts. The system continuously monitors classifier performance, categorizes errors systematically, and provides actionable feedback that reduces troubleshooting time while maintaining reliability through iterative improvement of the trained classifier based on identified errors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of repair

If detailed error analysis is implemented for trained classifiers, then troubleshooting efficiency is improved, but system complexity and testing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetroubleshooting efficiencyVSAvoidtesting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the complex error analysis functionality from the core aircraft control system into a separate testing and evaluation module. This extraction allows detailed error categorization and analysis to be performed independently, improving troubleshooting efficiency for the trained classifier without adding complexity to the critical aircraft control system itself. The testing system handles the analytical complexity while the control system maintains its simplicity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12559259B2Aircraft test system
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • US12559259B2 patent drawing
  • US12559259B2 patent drawing
  • US12559259B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A test apparatus and method for testing a trained classifier configured to control an aircraft system. Scenario data includes operating inputs representing an operational state of an aircraft and classifier outputs for controlling the aircraft system, is obtained. Model data representing a model of the at aircraft system is obtained. Error categorisation data for each aircraft operating scenario is generated based on respective classifier outputs applied to the model.