Aircraft Component Condition Prediction Using Decision Trees

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current maintenance practices for aircraft systems, such as air-conditioning systems, involve fixed intervals that can lead to unnecessary maintenance, incurring additional costs and inefficiencies, as they do not account for the actual condition of the components, particularly due to the difficulty in predicting filter blockages and fan failures.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method using an optimized decision tree for trend prediction, which measures and analyzes time-dependent data points to automate the estimation of future component conditions, allowing for precise alignment of maintenance with actual system needs without prior surveys, thereby reducing unnecessary servicing and ensuring necessary maintenance is performed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If fixed predetermined maintenance intervals are observed, then safety and functionality are ensured, but unnecessary maintenance is performed leading to additional costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety and functionalityVSAvoidadditional costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static fixed maintenance intervals to dynamic condition-based maintenance intervals. The system continuously monitors component conditions (vibration, temperature, pressure) and adjusts maintenance timing dynamically based on actual component state, allowing extension of maintenance intervals when components are healthy while detecting degradation trends that predict future failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback loops where component performance data is continuously collected, analyzed, and used to update maintenance decisions. The system provides feedback on component health status and degradation trends, enabling maintenance scheduling that responds to actual component conditions rather than following predetermined intervals blindly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If fixed predetermined maintenance intervals are observed, then safety is ensured, but maintenance time consumes available immobilisation time

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts maintenance timing based on actual component conditions, extending maintenance intervals for healthy components to utilize available immobilisation time more effectively, while prioritizing components showing degradation trends that predict imminent failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-monitoring of component conditions and self-prediction of maintenance needs, reducing the need for frequent manual inspections during immobilisation periods. The automated condition monitoring and trend analysis allow the system to determine its own maintenance requirements without consuming valuable ground time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Measurement precision

If filters are checked very frequently on site, then blockage is detected, but additional checking time is required during immobilisation times

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveblockage detectionVSAvoidchecking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary condition assessment continuously during operation by monitoring parameters such as pressure differential across filters, airflow rates, and vibration patterns. This preliminary monitoring detects early signs of blockage before they become critical, allowing planned maintenance during the next available immobilisation period rather than requiring frequent on-site checks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The condition monitoring system operates continuously during aircraft operation, constantly collecting data on component performance and degradation trends. This continuous monitoring replaces intermittent manual checks, providing ongoing detection of filter blockage and other component issues without consuming immobilisation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

4Productivity

If traditional time series analysis is used for trend prediction, then statistical analysis is performed, but it does not accurately predict actual component conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrend prediction capabilityVSAvoidcondition prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system moves beyond traditional time series analysis by incorporating multiple physical parameters (vibration, temperature, pressure, airflow) and their interrelationships. Instead of analyzing single parameters in isolation, the system evaluates combined parameter sets and their correlations to predict component conditions, achieving higher accuracy through multi-parameter analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional statistical time series analysis with physics-based modeling and machine learning algorithms that incorporate domain knowledge about component failure mechanisms. This substitution enables more accurate prediction of actual component conditions by using models that reflect physical degradation processes rather than purely statistical patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS9449274B2Method and device for predicting the condition of a component or system, computer program product
Publication Date: 2016.09.20 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US9449274B2 patent drawing
  • US9449274B2 patent drawing
  • US9449274B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device method and computer program product are disclosed for trend prediction of the course of a time-dependent series of data points of a component or system, particularly for an aircraft or spacecraft, including: providing an optimised decision tree, the input node of which is provided for inputting an input vector, the nodes of which contain the data points of a respective input vector and the leaves of which each contain an extrapolation function; iteratively calculating future data points by a respective time-dependent series of data points being inputted into the decision tree as an input vector and the decision tree calculating therefrom a data point subsequent to the last data point of the input vector in an automated manner, the calculated subsequent data point being added to the time-dependent series of data points in order to be used as a new input vector for the next iteration step.