Aircraft Conflict Resolution Using Priority-Based Deflection Angles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The increasing number of aircraft in the air leads to flight conflicts due to overlapping routes and speeds, resulting in reduced flight safety when the minimum distance between aircrafts is less than a preset distance.

Innovation Solution

A flight conflict resolution method and apparatus based on ultimatum game theory, which determines priority angles for deflection to maintain a safe distance between aircrafts by calculating negotiation angles and deflection angles using specific formulas, ensuring that the minimum distance between aircrafts is greater than or equal to a preset distance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the number of aircraft in the airspace increases, then the air traffic capacity and transportation efficiency are improved, but the flight safety deteriorates due to increased flight conflicts and reduced minimum distance between aircrafts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveair traffic capacityVSAvoidflight safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of flight conflicts by calculating the minimum distance between aircrafts within a preset time period before the conflict actually occurs. By identifying potential conflicts in advance and applying deflection angles proactively, the system prevents safety issues while allowing increased air traffic capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The conflict resolution system acts as an intermediary between multiple aircraft by introducing a third angle that mediates the distance relationship between conflicting aircrafts. This intermediary mechanism coordinates deflection angles to maintain safe distances while managing increased air traffic flow.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If aircrafts maintain fixed routes and speeds, then the flight operation simplicity and energy efficiency are improved, but the flight safety deteriorates when route intersections cause minimum distance to be less than preset distance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight operation simplicityVSAvoidflight safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring continuous route changes for all aircraft, the system applies deflection angles only to specific aircraft involved in detected conflicts. This partial action maintains simplicity for non-conflicting aircraft while resolving safety issues locally where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables aircraft to self-adjust their routes by calculating and applying appropriate deflection angles based on detected conflicts. Each aircraft independently determines its own route modification needs based on the conflict resolution algorithm, reducing the complexity of centralized control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If deflection angles are applied to resolve flight conflicts, then the flight safety is improved by maintaining minimum distance greater than or equal to preset distance, but the flight route deviation and operation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidflight route control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system resolves conflicts by changing the route parameters (deflection angles) of aircraft in a controlled manner. By adjusting angles within preset limits and only when conflicts are detected, the system maintains safety while minimizing unnecessary route deviations and operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11138893B2Flight conflict resolution method and apparatus based on ultimatum game theory
Publication Date: 2021.10.05 BEIHANG UNIV
  • US11138893B2 patent drawing
  • US11138893B2 patent drawing
  • US11138893B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are flight conflict resolution method and apparatus based on ultimatum game theory. The method includes: obtaining a first priority of a first aircraft and a second priority of a second aircraft when it is determined that a minimum distance between the first aircraft and the second aircraft within a preset time period is less than a preset distance; determining a first angle and a second angle of the first aircraft and a fourth angle and a fifth angle of the second aircraft according to the first priority, the second priority, and a preset limiting deflection angle; determining a third angle of the first aircraft and a sixth angle of the second aircraft; determining a first deflection angle of the first aircraft and a second deflection angle of the second aircraft according to the first and second priorities, the first, second, third, fourth, fifth and sixth angles.