Aircraft Control Systems: Configurable Remote Units for Fault Isolation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft systems require multiple, specially developed computers with specific interfaces, leading to high development costs, complex maintenance, and increased downtime due to the inability of devices to be shared across different systems, and existing integrated modular avionics systems face complexity and fault isolation challenges.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing identical remote electronics units with configurable interfaces and separate data buses for different aircraft functions, based on generic hardware and a deterministic field bus, allowing for shared components across systems like flight control, landing gear, and air conditioning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If specially developed computers with specific interfaces are used for each aircraft system, then system functionality and reliability are ensured, but development costs and device complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a universal computer architecture where a single computer type can perform multiple aircraft system functions through configurable interfaces. The computer includes programmable processors and configurable communication interfaces that can be adapted to different systems (flight control, landing gear, actuation, air conditioning) via software configuration rather than hardware differentiation, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If standalone computers are developed for specific aircraft systems, then system-specific requirements are met, but manufacturing costs and maintenance complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem-specific requirementsVSAvoidmanufacturing costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention employs a universal computer design that can be manufactured in larger volumes for multiple aircraft systems. The computer achieves system-specific adaptability through software configuration and configurable communication interfaces rather than through custom hardware development, enabling cost-effective series production while still meeting diverse system requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes configurable parameters including communication protocols, data formats, and interface configurations that can be adjusted via software to meet different aircraft system requirements. This parameter configurability allows a single hardware platform to serve multiple systems without requiring custom manufacturing for each application.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If multiple different devices are used across aircraft systems, then specific functional requirements are satisfied, but maintenance time and downtime increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional requirementsVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a fleet of identical or similar computers that can be interchangeably deployed across different aircraft systems. When a failure occurs, replacement with an identical unit can be performed quickly without complex interface adaptations, significantly reducing maintenance time and aircraft downtime while maintaining functional requirements through software configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If integrated modular avionics with data concentrators are used, then resource efficiency improves, but fault isolation becomes difficult and system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the aircraft systems into independent computer units, each responsible for specific functions but using identical hardware architectures. This segmentation allows for easier fault isolation compared to tightly integrated data concentrators, as failures can be contained to individual computer units while maintaining overall system resource efficiency through standardized interfaces and protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentEP3567809B1System for controlling, regulating and/or monitoring an aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 LIEBHERR AEROSPACE LINDENBERG GMBH
  • EP3567809B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3567809B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The invention relates to a system for controlling, regulating and/or monitoring an aircraft, comprising: at least one main processor unit, which is designed to process and output data; at least one first remote electronic unit having an interface which is designed to interact with a first aircraft function; and at least one second remote electronic unit having an interface, which is designed to interact with an interface of a second aircraft function, characterized in that the first remote electronic unit and the second remote electronic unit are identical to each other in terms of their hardware construction.