Aircraft Control Device for Dynamic Role Allocation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft control systems fail to effectively determine optimal roles and trajectories for multiple aircraft in a formation when engaging a target, as they do not adequately consider relative positional relations and energy efficiency in allocating tasks.

Innovation Solution

An aircraft control device that calculates and transmits optimal roles and trajectories based on relative positional relations, using evaluation values and IF-THEN rules to determine the most suitable actions for each aircraft, such as missile projection, guidance, and detection, while minimizing energy loss and maximizing effectiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If target allocation is performed based on basic movement information and target information, then role assignment is achieved, but optimal trajectory determination and energy efficiency are not considered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetarget engagement effectivenessVSAvoidaircraft energy expenditure
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters by introducing evaluation values that quantify multiple factors including energy consumption, trajectory optimality, and engagement effectiveness. These evaluation values are calculated based on aircraft position, target position, azimuth angles, and other parameters to determine the most efficient role allocation and trajectory for each aircraft.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts role allocation and trajectory determination by continuously calculating evaluation values based on real-time aircraft and target positions. The allocation is not static but adapts to changing battlefield conditions, allowing aircraft to optimize their energy expenditure while maintaining effective target engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If manual role and trajectory determination is performed for each aircraft, then precise control is achieved, but system complexity and operational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverole and trajectory determination accuracyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing each aircraft to automatically calculate its own evaluation value based on its position, capabilities, and the target position. Each aircraft independently determines its optimal role and trajectory through automated calculation rather than requiring manual assignment, reducing operational burden while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms where evaluation values are calculated based on aircraft and target positions, then used to determine optimal roles and trajectories. This closed-loop approach ensures accurate determination while automating the complex calculations, reducing the need for manual intervention in role allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If aircraft roles are assigned without considering relative positional relations, then simple allocation is achieved, but engagement effectiveness and energy efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverole allocation simplicityVSAvoidtarget engagement effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the simple allocation process into an optimized one by introducing calculation of evaluation values based on multiple parameters including azimuth angles, distances, and aircraft capabilities. This maintains ease of operation through automated calculation while significantly improving engagement effectiveness by considering relative positional relations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple aircraft engage a target without coordinated role assignment, then individual action freedom is maintained, but overall mission effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft operational flexibilityVSAvoidformation engagement effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves dynamic coordination where each aircraft maintains operational flexibility to perform its assigned role while the overall formation effectiveness is optimized through coordinated role assignment. The evaluation value calculation considers both individual aircraft capabilities and their contribution to the overall mission, allowing adaptable yet coordinated engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9383757B2Aircraft control device, aircraft, and method for controlling aircraft
Publication Date: 2016.07.05 MITSUBISHI HEAVY IND LTD
  • US9383757B2 patent drawing
  • US9383757B2 patent drawing
  • US9383757B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft control device determines, on the basis of relative positional relations between an individual aircraft and a target aircraft, a role of the individual aircraft with respect to the target aircraft, and a trajectory of the individual aircraft based on control operations determined according to the role of the individual aircraft. As an example, the aircraft control device represents the role of the individual aircraft with respect to the target aircraft as a numerical value and changes the role of the individual aircraft a plurality of times by changing the numerical value. Every time the role of the individual aircraft is changed, a minimum distance to target is calculated for the individual aircraft, and the role of the individual aircraft having the largest minimum distance to target is determined as the role of the individual aircraft.