Aircraft Control Surface Configuration Timing Based on Energy State

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for managing aircraft control surfaces, such as flaps, are primarily based on aircraft speed and do not account for energy considerations, leading to inefficient fuel usage and challenges in maintaining desired flight trajectories.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that identify a selected point in time to change the configuration of control surfaces based on the difference between the current and expected energy of the aircraft, using a computer system to determine the optimal time for configuration changes to maintain a four-dimensional flight trajectory.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If control surface configuration changes are based on aircraft speed, then the control process is simple, but fuel efficiency deteriorates and trajectory accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol process simplicityVSAvoidfuel efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from using only speed as a control parameter to using energy state (difference between current and expected energy) as the control parameter. This allows the system to optimize flap configuration timing based on actual energy conditions, improving fuel efficiency while maintaining trajectory accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the difference between current energy state and expected energy state, using this feedback to dynamically adjust flap configuration timing. This closed-loop control enables the aircraft to adapt to varying flight conditions and maintain optimal fuel efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If control surface configuration changes are made frequently to maintain trajectory, then trajectory accuracy is improved, but fuel consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrajectory accuracyVSAvoidfuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs configuration changes only when the energy state difference indicates it is necessary for maintaining trajectory. By using energy state as a threshold-based trigger, the system avoids unnecessary adjustments while still maintaining adequate trajectory accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentEP2450765B1Managing control surfaces for an aircraft
Publication Date: 2019.07.31 THE BOEING CO
  • EP2450765B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2450765B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2450765B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A method and apparatus for managing a number of control surfaces (116) for an aircraft (102). A current configuration for the number of control surfaces for the aircraft is identified during flight of the aircraft. A selected point in time at which the current configuration for the number of control surfaces is to be changed to a new configuration for the number of control surfaces is identified. A portion of time relative to the selected point in time during which the current configuration for the number of control surfaces is to be changed to the new configuration is identified based on a difference between a current amount of energy for the aircraft and an expected amount of energy for the aircraft.