Cooling system and aircraft cooling system comprising the same

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional cooling systems for aircraft, particularly those with composite components, face inefficiencies and weight issues due to the use of hydrofluorocarbon refrigerants like R-134a, and alternative refrigerants like carbon dioxide are too heavy, necessitating a more efficient and environmentally friendly cooling solution.

Innovation Solution

A cooling system with a cold sink and pressure regulating elements along each heat load cooling path, using refrigerants such as 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (R-134a) or 2,3,3,3-Tetrafluoropropene (R-1234yf), and incorporating a pump and evaporator to manage a two-phase fluid flow, ensuring consistent pressure drops and flow rates across multiple heat loads.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Temperature

If conventional vapor compression cycle is used to chill secondary coolant to sub-ambient temperature, then cooling performance is achieved, but system efficiency deteriorates and size and weight increase due to additional components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesub-ambient temperatureVSAvoidsystem components
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent utilizes phase transition of the cooling fluid from liquid to two-phase state directly at the heat loads through pressure regulating elements, eliminating the need for separate evaporators and condensers. The fluid absorbs heat during evaporation at each heat load location, providing sub-ambient cooling without complex vapor compression components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Solution Approach 2:

The system divides the cooling function into multiple independent cooling paths, each with its own pressure regulating element that creates a pressure drop to enable phase change. This segmentation allows distributed cooling without a centralized complex vapor compression system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If pressure regulating elements are added to each heat load cooling path to create pressure drop, then cooling efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecooling efficiencyVSAvoidpressure regulating elements
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressure regulating elements change the pressure parameter of the cooling fluid in each cooling path, creating the necessary pressure drop to enable phase change from liquid to two-phase state. This parameter change allows the fluid to absorb heat more effectively at each heat load without requiring complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If carbon dioxide is used as refrigerant to reduce global warming potential, then environmental impact is reduced, but system weight increases substantially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveglobal warming potentialVSAvoidsystem weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the operating parameters of the refrigerant by using pressure regulating elements to create pressure drops in each cooling path. This enables efficient heat transfer with lighter refrigerants like R-134a or R-1234yf, avoiding the need for heavy carbon dioxide systems while maintaining environmental performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This configuration enhances cooling efficiency, reduces system weight, and minimizes environmental impact by maintaining consistent cooling performance across varying heat loads while minimizing the need for additional components and inefficiencies.

Implementation Method 1

each pressure regulating element arranged between the inlet and the heat load along each heat load cooling path and configured to cause a pressure drop in the cooling fluid prior to passing the cooling fluid to each heat load

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPressure drop: Pressure Drop

Implementation Method 2

The cooling fluid is a liquid at the inlet and a two-phase fluid at the outlet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase change: Phase Change

Implementation Method 3

an outlet configured to receive the cooling fluid after passing through the plurality of heat load cooling paths of the cold sink

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat absorption: Heat Sink

Data Source

PatentEP4339532A1Cooling system and aircraft cooling system comprising the same
Publication Date: 2024.03.20 HAMILTON SUNDSTRAND CORP
  • EP4339532A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4339532A1 patent drawingFigure 2A~2B
  • EP4339532A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Cooling systems include a cold sink (102) having a number of heat load cooling paths (206a - d) and a heat load (310a - d) associated with each cooling path. An inlet (202) is configured to supply a cooling fluid into the cold sink and an outlet (214) is configured to receive the cooling fluid after passing through the plurality of heat load cooling paths of the cold sink. A pressure regulating element (316a - d) is arranged along each cooling path, each pressure regulating element arranged between the inlet and the heat load along each cooling path and configured to cause a pressure drop in the cooling fluid prior to passing the cooling fluid to each heat load. The pressure drop caused by each pressure regulating element is the same and is a pressure drop greater than a maximum pressure drop across each heat load of a system without such pressure regulating elements.