Aircraft Continuous Descent Arrival Time Predictability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Continuous descent approaches in aircraft navigation face challenges due to uncertainties in wind conditions, leading to increased separation requirements between aircraft, which reduces airport capacity and introduces inaccuracies in arrival times during turns.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to maintain a predetermined aerodynamic flight path angle during continuous descent approaches, with corrections calculated to compensate for ground speed drift during turns, ensuring accurate kinetic energy balance and potential energy adjustments to correct for wind-induced errors, thereby improving arrival time predictability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of energy

If continuous descent approaches are implemented, then fuel efficiency and noise reduction are improved, but arrival time predictability deteriorates due to wind uncertainties

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoidarrival time predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the aircraft navigation system continuously monitors actual ground speed and compares it with the desired ground speed history. When deviations are detected due to wind variations, the system calculates and applies corrections to the flight path angle to compensate for these deviations, thereby maintaining arrival time predictability while preserving the fuel efficiency benefits of continuous descent approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts the flight path angle parameter based on real-time ground speed measurements and wind conditions. By changing this critical flight parameter in response to environmental variations, the system maintains both the energy efficiency of continuous descent and the arrival time predictability required for safe aircraft separation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If larger separations are imposed between aircraft to account for wind uncertainties, then safety is improved, but airport capacity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidairport capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

By implementing real-time feedback control that monitors and corrects ground speed deviations, the system reduces the uncertainty in arrival times. This enhanced predictability allows air traffic controllers to maintain smaller safety separations between aircraft, thereby increasing airport capacity while preserving safety margins.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If constant airspeed control is used during continuous descent, then ease of operation is improved, but arrival time predictability deteriorates compared to constant flight path angle

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidarrival time predictability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static airspeed control to dynamic flight path angle control. By making the flight path angle a dynamic parameter that adjusts in real-time based on ground speed measurements and wind conditions, the system achieves superior arrival time predictability while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the controlled parameter from airspeed to flight path angle. This parameter change fundamentally improves arrival time predictability because flight path angle directly determines the vertical descent rate and time to reach the runway threshold, whereas airspeed control does not directly control the descent timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If tactical corrections are applied during continuous descent, then adaptability to wind changes is improved, but the complexity of the approach deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to wind changesVSAvoidcomplexity of the approach
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements an automated feedback control system that performs the adaptive adjustments previously requiring complex manual intervention. The navigation system automatically monitors ground speed, calculates required flight path angle corrections, and applies them seamlessly, thereby providing adaptability to wind changes without increasing operational complexity for the pilot.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8442707B2Implementing continuous descent approaches for maximum predictability in aircraft
Publication Date: 2013.05.14 THE BOEING CO
  • US8442707B2 patent drawing
  • US8442707B2 patent drawing
  • US8442707B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to continuous descent approaches that ensure the greatest certainty in arrival time. The continuous descent approach is flown by maintaining an aerodynamic flight path angle, thereby allowing a ground speed to be followed with greater accuracy. An improvement is described that accounts for turns made during continuous descent approaches that may otherwise cause a drift away from the desired ground speed, and hence arrival time. A correction to the aerodynamic flight path angle is used that produces a compensatory change in the potential energy of the aircraft upon completing the turn to balance the anticipated drift in kinetic energy.