Aircraft Design Problem Early Warning System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft design methodologies lack flexibility and agility in tracking maintenance parameters from preliminary design to firm configuration, leading to delayed design completion, increased maintenance costs, and inefficient scheduled maintenance tasks due to limited capabilities in revising non-optimized designs and inconsistent data submission.

Innovation Solution

An unsupervised machine learning method that processes heterogeneous design problem and in-service event data to generate high-order vectors, similarity matrices, and impact scores, prioritizing design updates and maintenance schedules to minimize operational consequences, using dimensionality reduction and operational impact estimation algorithms.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual engineering analysis and engineering judgment are used to determine maintenance scheduling frequency, then maintenance tasks can be scheduled conservatively to ensure safety, but the process lacks flexibility and agility in tracking maintenance parameters from preliminary design to firm configuration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance safetyVSAvoidflexibility in tracking maintenance parameters
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of design problems and their potential maintenance impacts during the design phase itself, rather than waiting until later stages. By using machine learning models to predict maintenance parameters and identify potential issues early in the design process, the system enables proactive optimization of maintenance schedules before the design is finalized, thus maintaining safety while improving flexibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop that continuously tracks maintenance parameters from preliminary design through firm configuration and into operational phases. By monitoring actual maintenance data and comparing it with predicted values, the system provides feedback that enables continuous optimization of maintenance schedules, improving both flexibility and adaptability while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If design reviews and engineering tribunals are conducted late in the design process to determine continued airworthiness, then comprehensive analysis can be performed, but design completion is delayed and rework is necessitated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinued airworthinessVSAvoiddesign completion time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning system performs airworthiness analysis and design problem identification during the preliminary and intermediate design stages, rather than waiting for late-stage reviews. By predicting potential airworthiness issues early and providing recommendations for mitigation, the system enables continuous assessment throughout the design process, eliminating the need for time-consuming late-stage tribunals and reducing design completion time while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system identifies and flags potential airworthiness problems during the design phase itself, allowing designers to address issues before they become critical. By providing early warning and prediction of design problems that could affect continued airworthiness, the system cushions against the need for late-stage design changes and rework, reducing both time loss and maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If scheduled maintenance tasks are established based on limited operator data and conservative engineering judgment, then maintenance safety is ensured, but optimization of maintenance schedules is limited and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance safetyVSAvoidmaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a feedback mechanism that collects and analyzes actual maintenance data from multiple operators throughout the aircraft lifecycle. By continuously comparing predicted maintenance needs with actual maintenance outcomes, the system learns and refines its predictions, enabling optimization of maintenance schedules based on real-world performance data while maintaining safety through continuous monitoring and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning model dynamically adjusts maintenance scheduling parameters based on accumulated operational data and predicted design problem impacts. By changing maintenance intervals and task priorities based on actual aircraft performance and predicted issues, the system optimizes maintenance efficiency while maintaining safety, moving away from static conservative schedules to adaptive optimized schedules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If comprehensive design problem data and in-service event data are collected and analyzed using machine learning, then early identification of high-impact design problems is enabled, but data processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveentry-into-service reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary machine learning system that acts as a mediator between raw design problem data and operational decisions. The ML model processes heterogeneous data from multiple sources, transforms it into meaningful predictions about design problem impacts, and presents optimized recommendations to users. This intermediary layer handles the complexity of data processing internally while presenting simplified, actionable outputs, thus improving reliability without burdening users with processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10372872B2Providing early warning and assessment of vehicle design problems with potential operational impact
Publication Date: 2019.08.06 THE BOEING CO
  • US10372872B2 patent drawing
  • US10372872B2 patent drawing
  • US10372872B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and apparatus for unsupervised aircraft design. A plurality of design problem data and service event data for an aircraft is received from an electronic data repository. Embodiments communicate with sensors on the aircraft during flight operations and capturing service data and sensor data. A high order vector is generated for each received problem report and service event data and each high order vector is concatenated into a high order vector matrix. Embodiments generate a reduced order symptom-normalized matrix by factorization of the concatenated high order vector matrix and generate a similarity matrix from the symptom-normalized matrix. An impact score is computed for each in-service event data as a function of similar problem reports using the similarity matrix. Embodiments generate a priority matrix configured to identify service event data having high impact scores and communicate a real-time alert of the high impact scored service event.