Aircraft Maintenance Disruption Severity Index

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems fail to efficiently and cost-effectively manage unscheduled maintenance events on aircraft by not considering both flight and maintenance schedules, and do not calculate the disruption severity of such events when coordinating repairs.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus and method that include a disruption severity module to calculate a disruption severity index value based on various flight operation factors, and a flight recommendation module to decide whether to resolve the unscheduled maintenance event before a subsequent flight or fly the aircraft without fixing it, using real-time data from flight and maintenance schedules, and external sources.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of repair

If conventional maintenance management systems coordinate maintenance resources to repair faults, then maintenance capability is improved, but flight schedule disruption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance capabilityVSAvoidflight schedule disruption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of repairVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of maintenance prioritization from fixed protocols to dynamic disruption severity indexing. By calculating disruption severity indices based on multiple flight operation factors, the system adapts maintenance priorities to current operational conditions, allowing faults to be resolved in order of their actual impact on flight schedules rather than following rigid maintenance rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces dynamic decision-making for maintenance scheduling. Instead of static maintenance plans, the system continuously evaluates flight operation factors and adjusts maintenance priorities in real-time. The disruption severity module dynamically re-ranks maintenance tasks based on current flight schedule impacts, enabling flexible adaptation to changing operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If flight scheduling systems adjust schedules for delays, then flight operation flexibility is improved, but coordination with maintenance schedules deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight schedule flexibilityVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges flight scheduling and maintenance management into a single integrated platform. The disruption severity module simultaneously considers both flight operation factors and maintenance requirements, creating unified decisions that coordinate both functions. This integration eliminates the need for separate systems to communicate and resolve conflicts independently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated system performs multiple functions: it manages flight scheduling, tracks maintenance requirements, calculates disruption severity, and coordinates repair activities all within one platform. This multi-functional approach replaces multiple specialized systems, reducing inter-system complexity while maintaining operational flexibility

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Measurement precision

If disruption severity calculation is implemented, then maintenance prioritization accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisruption severity measurement accuracyVSAvoidcalculation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The disruption severity calculation is segmented into distinct flight operation factors (e.g., delay duration, aircraft type, route importance, maintenance window availability). Each factor is evaluated separately and then aggregated into an overall disruption severity index. This segmentation makes the complex calculation manageable by breaking it into standardized, reusable components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS9037320B1Unscheduled maintenance disruption severity and flight decision system and method
Publication Date: 2015.05.19 THE BOEING CO
  • US9037320B1 patent drawing
  • US9037320B1 patent drawing
  • US9037320B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is an apparatus that includes a disruption severity module and flight recommendation module. The disruption severity module calculates a disruption severity index value associated with an unscheduled maintenance event of an aircraft. The disruption severity index value is calculated based on a plurality of flight operation factors affected by the unscheduled maintenance event. The flight recommendation module recommends one of resolving the unscheduled maintenance event of the aircraft before a subsequent flight of the aircraft or flying the aircraft without resolving the unscheduled maintenance event of the aircraft based on the disruption severity index value.