Aircraft Door Interlock Assembly for Auto-Disarm Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft door emergency support systems lack efficient mechanisms to control their active or inactive conditions, leading to potential inefficiencies and risks during emergency evacuations.

Innovation Solution

An interlock assembly is integrated into the aircraft door system, featuring a triggering shaft with interlock and auto-disarm cams, allowing for precise control of the emergency support system's mode selection and prevention of inadvertent actuation during door opening, thereby ensuring the system remains disarmed when the door is open.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an emergency support system is always active, then safety during emergency evacuation is improved, but the risk of inadvertent actuation and mechanical failures increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety during emergency evacuationVSAvoidinadvertent actuation and mechanical failures
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The interlock assembly is configured to automatically disarm the emergency support system when the door transitions to the open position, preventing inadvertent actuation before it can occur. The cam mechanism preliminarily sets the system state based on door position, ensuring safety by default when the door is open.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The interlock assembly acts as an intermediary mechanism between the door position and the emergency support system activation. It mediates the control signal through cam mechanisms that translate door position into corresponding system states (armed/disarmed), preventing direct and potentially erroneous activation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If a complex control mechanism is added to prevent inadvertent actuation, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of inadvertent actuationVSAvoidinterlock assembly structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The interlock assembly merges multiple functions (interlocking, auto-disarming, mode selection) into a single integrated mechanism. The cam mechanisms combine several control actions that would otherwise require separate components, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The triggering shaft with integrated cam mechanisms serves multiple functions: it detects door position, controls system arming/disarming, and prevents inadvertent actuation. This multi-functional design reduces the number of separate components needed, balancing complexity with reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the emergency support system is disarmed when the door is open, then inadvertent actuation is prevented, but the system may not be ready for immediate emergency use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinadvertent actuation preventionVSAvoidreadiness for emergency use
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its state based on door position. When the door closes, the interlock assembly automatically arms the system, ensuring readiness for emergency use. When the door opens, it automatically disarms to prevent inadvertent actuation. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction between safety and readiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The interlock assembly provides feedback control by continuously monitoring door position and automatically adjusting the emergency support system state accordingly. The cam mechanisms detect door position and provide feedback signals that trigger arming or disarming, ensuring the system is always in the appropriate state without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP4403461B1Interlock assembly for an aircraft door
Publication Date: 2026.02.25 ROHR INC
  • EP4403461B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4403461B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4403461B1 patent drawingFigure 4A~4B

AI summary

An interlock assembly (52) for an aircraft door (28) includes a shaft (54), an interlock first portion (56), and an auto-disarm second portion (58). The shaft (54) is rotatable about a second rotational axis (60) between an armed position and a disarmed position. The shaft (54) includes an interlock cam (64) and an auto-disarm cam (66). In a first interlock position, the interlock first portion (56) permits rotation of the shaft (54) between the armed position and the disarmed position. In a second interlock position, the interlock first portion (56) prevents rotation of the shaft (54) from the disarmed position to the armed position. In a first auto-disarm position, the auto-disarm second portion (58) permits rotation of the shaft (54) between the armed position and the disarmed position. In a second auto-disarm position, the auto-disarm second portion (58) prevents rotation of the shaft (54) from the disarmed position to the armed position.