Aircraft Landing Gear Door Assembly Jig

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The current aircraft assembly process for landing gear components is slow, complex, and risky due to repeated extension and retraction of the landing gear, which can lead to damage and safety concerns, and requires precise alignment to ensure a clean aerodynamic surface when the gear is retracted.

Innovation Solution

An aircraft assembly jig with adjustable members and a lifting device that allows for independent positioning of components, enabling pre-alignment and simultaneous installation, reducing the need for repeated gear extension and retraction, and ensuring correct alignment with the aircraft's contours.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If components are installed sequentially with repeated landing gear extension and retraction for alignment, then alignment precision is improved, but assembly time increases and safety risk worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidassembly time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The jig allows components to be pre-positioned and aligned on the ground before installation. The elevation platform and adjustable jig members enable precise alignment to be achieved in advance, eliminating the need for repeated landing gear extension and retraction during the assembly process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The jig acts as an intermediary device between the components and the aircraft. It provides a stable reference framework with adjustable members that can precisely position components relative to each other and to the aircraft, replacing the need to use the landing gear itself as the alignment reference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If repeated landing gear extension and retraction is performed for alignment, then alignment precision is improved, but safety risk worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidsafety risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Alignment is performed in advance on the ground using the jig, where components can be safely positioned and adjusted without the landing gear moving. This eliminates the safety risks associated with repeated extension and retraction operations during the alignment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The jig serves as a safe intermediary structure that provides stable support and precise positioning for components. It replaces the landing gear as the reference structure, eliminating the need to repeatedly move the landing gear and associated safety risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional sequential installation method is used, then alignment precision can be achieved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The jig combines multiple alignment and positioning functions into a single integrated device. Multiple adjustable jig members can simultaneously position multiple components, and the elevation platform can lift the entire assembly as one unit, replacing the complex sequential process of individual component installation and alignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The jig enables all alignment operations to be performed in advance in a single setup, rather than requiring multiple separate alignment operations during installation. This consolidates the complex sequential process into a simpler pre-positioning operation followed by direct installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If components are pre-positioned using the jig, then installation speed is improved, but jig complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstallation speedVSAvoidjig complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The jig is divided into modular components including multiple independently adjustable jig members and an elevation platform. Each segment can be independently adjusted and positioned, allowing flexible configuration for different component arrangements while maintaining overall system manageability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The jig incorporates adjustable members that can be dynamically repositioned to accommodate different component sizes and positions. The elevation platform provides dynamic height adjustment capability, allowing the jig to adapt to various installation requirements while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240327036A1Assembly jigs and methods of installing doors to an aircraft
Publication Date: 2024.10.03 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • US20240327036A1 patent drawing
  • US20240327036A1 patent drawing
  • US20240327036A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft assembly jig for fitting a number of landing gear door components to an aircraft. The jig includes a lifting device for elevating the components towards the aircraft for fitting, and a number of adjustable platforms attached to the lifting device, each of which holds one of the landing gear door components. The adjustable platforms allow each of the components to be positioned independently so that when elevated together towards the aircraft by the lifting device, each component is correctly and independently aligned and positioned for installation at the aircraft.