Split Handle for Aircraft Door Pressure Management

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft external doors often face issues with unintended or uncontrolled opening due to pressure differentials, inadequate venting mechanisms, and the need for two-handed operation, which can lead to safety hazards during takeoff and cargo access.

Innovation Solution

A handle assembly with multiple movable sections and actuators that integrates lock and latching mechanisms, ensuring secure operation by requiring both sections to be moved simultaneously for door opening, and actively managing pressure equalization through sector gears, preventing sudden uncontrolled openings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If separate handles are used for venting and latching mechanisms, then each function can be operated independently, but the possibility of inadvertent operation increases and door security is diminished

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndependent operation of venting and latchingVSAvoidDoor security and prevention of inadvertent opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the venting and latching mechanisms into a single integrated handle assembly. The handle includes a first portion that operates the venting mechanism and a second portion that operates the latching mechanism, both controlled from one location. This merging ensures that both functions must be operated together, preventing inadvertent opening while maintaining ease of operation through unified control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The handle is divided into distinct first and second portions, each responsible for a specific function (venting and latching). This segmentation allows independent control of each function while requiring both to be operated together for door opening, thus maintaining functional independence while ensuring security through coordinated operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Device complexity

If passive spring-actuated vents are used, then the venting mechanism is simple, but it can malfunction due to icing or other adverse conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSimplicity of venting mechanismVSAvoidVenting performance under adverse conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The handle assembly is designed to actively open the vent before the door is opened. By preliminarily equalizing the pressure across the door through active vent opening, the system prevents the adverse effects of pressure differentials that could lead to uncontrolled door opening, thereby improving reliability without significantly increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If no vents are provided, then the door structure is simpler, but a dangerous pressure differential exists when the door is opened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDoor structure simplicityVSAvoidPressure differential causing uncontrolled door opening
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The venting mechanism is activated before door opening to preliminarily equalize the pressure across the door. This preliminary action removes the harmful pressure differential that would otherwise cause uncontrolled door opening, thereby eliminating the harmful factor while maintaining relatively simple door structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Ease of operation

If translating-motion operation is used, then the door is easy to operate for passenger access, but it is not desirable for cargo area access

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEase of door operationVSAvoidSuitability for cargo area access
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The handle assembly incorporates rotational motion to operate the latching mechanism, which is more suitable for cargo area access. The dynamic design allows the handle to rotate and engage/disengage the latching mechanism effectively, providing adaptability for cargo operations while maintaining ease of operation through the integrated design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2193078B1Split handle for aircraft door
Publication Date: 2014.11.12 BE AEROSPACE INC
  • EP2193078B1 patent drawingFigure 1A
  • EP2193078B1 patent drawingFigure 1B
  • EP2193078B1 patent drawingFigure 2A

AI summary

A handle for use in operating a door of an aircraft. The handle is fixed to a shaft and rotates the shaft about an axis. The handle includes multiple separately movable sections, the sections arranged so that each section has a limited range of movement separate from the other. The handle is capable of operating the door when the sections are moved substantially in unison. The handle also provides positive actuation of movable door components.