Aircraft Drilling Positioning Using Dual Geometry Verification
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
In the aircraft industry, structural parts often need to be finished and fitted in confined spaces, requiring time-consuming and labor-intensive assembly processes, especially when drilling through materials like carbon-fiber reinforced plastic and Titanium, where drilling speeds are compromised due to material challenges and the need for repeated hole drilling.
Innovation Solution
A method using a machine tool device with a measuring unit and control system that pre-drills components to final dimensions, includes machine-readable data for precise positioning, and uses ultrasonic or other contactless methods for accurate hole alignment, allowing automatic drilling from outside confined spaces without the need for drilling templates or shims, reducing wear and assembly time.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Productivity
If drilling is performed in confined spaces through materials like carbon-fiber reinforced plastic and Titanium, then the holes can be created for assembly, but drilling speeds are compromised and tool wear increases
Solution Approach 1:
The component is pre-drilled to final dimensions at the supplier before assembly. This preliminary action eliminates the need for time-consuming drilling operations during final assembly, thereby improving productivity while avoiding the material-related drilling challenges in confined spaces
Solution Approach 2:
The drilling operation is extracted from the assembly process and performed separately at the component manufacturing stage. This separation allows drilling to be done in optimal conditions at the supplier's facility rather than in confined assembly spaces, resolving the contradiction between productivity and material challenges
2Manufacturing precision
If traditional assembly methods with templates and shims are used in confined spaces, then positioning can be achieved, but assembly time and effort increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
Traditional mechanical positioning methods (templates and shims) are replaced with an automated optical/measuring system. The measuring device scans the component and workpiece to automatically determine precise positions, eliminating manual positioning operations and significantly reducing assembly time while maintaining high precision
Solution Approach 2:
The component and workpiece themselves provide the positioning information through their geometric features. The measuring device reads data directly from the components (holes, surfaces, edges) to determine positions, allowing the components to 'self-position' without requiring external templates or shims
3Manufacturing precision
If multiple measurements and verification steps are performed to ensure positioning accuracy, then assembly quality improves, but the process complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
Multiple measurement and verification operations are merged into a single integrated scanning process. The measuring device performs all necessary measurements (component features, workpiece features, position verification) in one automated sequence, improving assembly quality while actually simplifying the process by eliminating separate manual measurement steps
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
This method reduces assembly time and effort, increases accuracy to 0.1 mm, minimizes tool wear, and eliminates the need for pilot holes and shims, improving ergonomics and assembly rate while reducing burr-related disassembly and reassembly issues.
Implementation Method 1
the measuring unit may use an ultrasonic measuring head, and the second geometric datum is measured by means of ultrasonic waves
Data Source
AI summary
A drilling method is provided allowing drilling in confined spaces with less effort. Two independent data sources are used for reducing tolerances between the component to be joined to the workpiece. The component is measured at the supplier using photogrammetry or laser scanning. First geometric data of the component obtained by this measurement are put in a data storage, such as a barcode tag or database. At the manufacturer, the first geometric data are used to position the component relative to the workpiece. Subsequently, the component is measured to obtain second geometric data indicative of the positions and diameters of the component joining holes. After determining a deviation between the first and second geometric data to be smaller than a predetermined threshold, the automatic drill is positioned at the correct drilling location and joining holes are drilled into the workpiece. Finally, the component and the workpiece are joined by fasteners.


