Aircraft Engine Control Unit Diagnostic Device

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current diagnostic methods for aircraft engine control units are cumbersome, requiring disassembly and are prone to errors, leading to increased maintenance time and costs due to the complexity of connecting multiple connectors and the inability to identify faults accurately without dismantling equipment.

Innovation Solution

A portable, autonomous diagnostic device with a single connection cable for automatic continuity and electrical insulation tests, allowing for fault identification without simulating flight conditions, and a method to analyze the health status of connectors and control units directly on the aircraft, reducing the need for disassembly and minimizing errors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a test bench is used to carry out diagnosis, then the control unit can be thoroughly tested, but the test bench is heavy and not easily transportable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnosis completenessVSAvoidtest bench weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention divides the diagnostic system into two parts: a portable diagnostic device that can be easily transported and a test bench that remains in the workshop. The portable device performs preliminary diagnostics and fault identification, while the test bench handles comprehensive testing when the control unit is removed. This segmentation allows the diagnostic capability to be distributed between a mobile unit and a stationary unit, resolving the contradiction between portability and diagnostic completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If a diagnostic device with multiple connecting ports is used, then comprehensive tests can be performed, but the device becomes oversized and connectors may interfere with maintenance operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting capabilityVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The connecting capability is segmented between the portable diagnostic device and the control unit itself. The portable device has a single connecting port that interfaces with the control unit's existing multiple ports. The control unit's internal architecture provides the versatility for comprehensive testing, while the portable device maintains a compact form factor with minimal external connectors, thus resolving the contradiction between testing capability and device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The portable diagnostic device copies or replicates the functionality of the test bench's connecting capabilities through software and processing power, rather than physically replicating multiple heavy connectors. The device uses its single port to communicate with the control unit's existing connector system, leveraging the control unit's own architecture to provide comprehensive testing capability without adding physical bulk to the portable device.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple connectors are used to connect the diagnostic device, then comprehensive tests can be performed, but the connectors may become intertwined and interfere with maintenance operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting capabilityVSAvoidmaintenance operation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The connecting function is segmented so that the portable diagnostic device uses a single connector, while the control unit's existing connector system handles the complexity of multiple connections. This segmentation eliminates the problem of intertwined connectors during maintenance operations, as only one connector needs to be managed by the technician, while preserving comprehensive testing capability through the control unit's internal connector architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Loss of time

If faults are identified without dismantling equipment, then maintenance time is reduced, but the ability to identify the source of the fault is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance timeVSAvoidfault source identification
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The portable diagnostic device implements feedback mechanisms that allow it to identify faults and their sources without physical dismantling. The device communicates with the control unit's internal systems, receives feedback signals, and uses this information to trace faults back to their specific sources (such as specific sensors, actuators, or internal circuits). This feedback loop enables non-invasive fault source identification, resolving the contradiction between reduced maintenance time and accurate fault localization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20230408567A1Diagnosis of an aircraft engine control unit
Publication Date: 2023.12.21 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • US20230408567A1 patent drawing
  • US20230408567A1 patent drawing
  • US20230408567A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for diagnosing an engine control unit of an aircraft uses a device having an autonomous and mobile electronic diagnostic unit and connecting means for connecting the unit to an engine control unit of an aircraft. The connecting means advantageously includes a single connection cable.