Aircraft Engine Debris Source Identification via Signature Elements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for identifying the source of particulate debris in aircraft engines are inefficient, requiring extensive maintenance time to determine which component is causing premature wear, as they cannot accurately distinguish between similar components within a set, leading to increased maintenance costs.

Innovation Solution

Introducing a method that analyzes the composition of particulate debris by identifying main and signature elements, correlating them with specific material compositions of engine components, and using unique trace elements to differentiate between components, allowing for precise identification of the source component.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional debris analysis methods are used to identify source components, then maintenance personnel can detect the presence of particulate material, but they cannot accurately distinguish between similar components within a set, leading to extensive maintenance time and increased costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedebris source identification accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by introducing unique signature elements into specific components within a set. Each component receives a distinct chemical or physical signature (such as trace amounts of specific elements or isotopic ratios) that differentiates it from other components made of the same base material. This allows debris analysis to precisely identify which specific component degraded, transforming an otherwise indistinguishable set of components into individually identifiable units through localized material modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by modifying the chemical composition parameters of components through the addition of signature elements. By varying the concentration or presence of specific trace elements, isotopic ratios, or material additives in different components, the system creates detectable parameter differences that enable precise debris source identification. This transforms components with identical macroscopic properties into distinguishable units through microscopic compositional variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If components are made of the same material composition to ensure uniform performance, then reliability is improved, but the ability to distinguish between components for diagnostic purposes is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent performance consistencyVSAvoidcomponent identification information
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent resolves this contradiction by applying local quality through the strategic introduction of signature elements into specific components. The base material composition remains uniform across all components to ensure consistent performance and reliability, while localized additions of trace signature elements (such as specific metal traces, isotopic markers, or polymer additives) provide unique identification information. This dual approach maintains bulk material uniformity while embedding distinguishable local characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs composite materials by combining a uniform base material with trace signature elements. The primary material composition ensures consistent mechanical and operational properties across all components, while the embedded signature elements (present in minimal concentrations) provide identification capabilities. This composite approach allows the material to simultaneously fulfill performance requirements and diagnostic identification functions without compromising either aspect.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Measurement precision

If extensive disassembly and inspection are performed to identify the source component, then accurate diagnosis can be achieved, but maintenance time and costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvediagnostic accuracyVSAvoidmaintenance efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical disassembly and inspection methods with chemical/physical analysis methods. Instead of physically dismantling engine components to identify degradation sources, the system uses debris analysis techniques (such as mass spectrometry, X-ray fluorescence, or chromatography) to detect signature elements in worn particles. This substitution of mechanical inspection with analytical chemistry/physics methods enables accurate source identification without extensive disassembly, dramatically improving maintenance efficiency while maintaining diagnostic accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses signature elements as intermediaries to transmit component identification information. Rather than directly observing or testing components to identify their condition, the signature elements act as mediators that carry identification information from the source component through the lubrication system to the debris analysis equipment. This intermediary approach enables indirect but accurate identification of component status and source, avoiding the need for direct mechanical inspection of each component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11982663B2Method of identifying a source component of particulate debris in an aircraft engine
Publication Date: 2024.05.14 PRATT & WHITNEY CANADA CORP
  • US11982663B2 patent drawing
  • US11982663B2 patent drawing
  • US11982663B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The method can include analyzing the composition of the particulate polymer debris, including ascertaining a presence of at least one main polymer element and a presence or absence of at least one signature polymer element in the particulate debris; establishing a correlation between the particulate polymer debris and a set of components, including matching the ascertained presence of the at least one main polymer element to a family of polymers from which the components of the set, including the source component, are made; and determining the source component amongst the components of the set, including matching the ascertained presence or absence of the at least one signature polymer element to a polymer composition of the source component.