Aircraft Engine Thrust Ramping Control via Crosswind Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current thrust ramping systems in aircraft engines apply uniform thrust limits across all crosswind conditions, leading to unnecessary restrictions during mild winds, which increase maintenance costs and require longer runways or lighter payloads, while failing to account for varying crosswind speeds.

Innovation Solution

A system that selectively activates thrust ramping based on measured crosswind speeds during taxiing, employing different thrust schedules and output limits to only impose restrictions when crosswinds exceed a threshold, allowing full thrust during non-adverse conditions and optimizing takeoff performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If uniform thrust limits are applied during all takeoff conditions, then engine stress is reduced under crosswind conditions, but unnecessary thrust restrictions occur during mild winds leading to increased maintenance costs and reduced operational efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine stress reductionVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The thrust ramping system dynamically adjusts thrust limits based on real-time crosswind conditions. The controller continuously monitors crosswind speed and modifies the thrust ramping schedule accordingly, transitioning from static uniform limits to dynamic condition-based limits. This allows the system to optimize between engine protection and operational efficiency by adapting thrust restrictions only when crosswind conditions warrant them.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the thrust parameter (thrust limit) based on varying crosswind conditions. When crosswind speed exceeds a threshold, the system implements thrust ramping with specific acceleration limits; when crosswind is mild, the system allows full thrust or modified thrust schedules. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by applying thrust restrictions only when necessary for engine protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If thrust ramping is applied during mild crosswinds, then engine wear is reduced, but aircraft performance is degraded requiring longer runways or lighter payloads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengine wear reductionVSAvoidrunway length
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The thrust ramping system dynamically adapts to crosswind conditions by adjusting the thrust acceleration rate. During mild crosswinds, the system either disables thrust ramping or applies modified schedules with higher thrust limits, allowing aircraft to achieve takeoff speed within available runway length. During severe crosswinds, the system implements stricter ramping schedules that protect the engine while minimizing performance degradation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system modifies the thrust parameter (acceleration rate) based on crosswind speed. When crosswind exceeds the threshold, the system implements thrust ramping with controlled acceleration; when crosswind is below the threshold, the system allows full thrust or relaxed ramping schedules. This conditional parameter change eliminates unnecessary runway length requirements during mild winds while maintaining engine protection during adverse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If crosswind threshold detection is implemented, then thrust ramping is activated only when necessary, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvethrust optimizationVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The flight management system or engine controller is enhanced to perform multiple functions: it continues to manage normal thrust operations and now also detects crosswind conditions and determines appropriate thrust ramping schedules. By making the control system multi-functional rather than adding a completely separate crosswind detection system, the patent reduces overall system complexity while still achieving conditional thrust optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The controller acts as an intermediary that receives crosswind information (from existing sensors or pilot input), processes it against stored threshold criteria, and automatically selects appropriate thrust ramping schedules. This intermediary function simplifies the interface between crosswind detection and thrust control, avoiding the need for complex direct coupling between multiple subsystems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3290674B1Method and apparatus to control thrust ramping of an aircraft engine
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 THE BOEING CO
  • EP3290674B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3290674B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3290674B1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

Methods and apparatus to control thrust ramping of an aircraft engine are disclosed. An example thrust control system includes a sensor to measure a crosswind speed and a thrust manager to compare the measured crosswind speed to a crosswind threshold range. The thrust manager activates a partial thrust ramping schedule during takeoff when the measured crosswind speed is within the crosswind threshold range. The partial thrust ramping schedule is selected from a plurality of thrust ramping schedules.