Aircraft Failure Prediction via Behavior Model Deviation Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft monitoring systems often fail to anticipate unexpected failures, leading to flight delays or cancellations due to predefined rules that may not account for unsuspected phenomena, resulting in inadequate maintenance scheduling.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that analyze flight parameter behavior using a preconstructed behavior model generated from historical data to detect deviations, allowing for early identification of precursors to failures and scheduling maintenance in advance, thereby ensuring optimal aircraft availability without delays.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If predefined rules are used to detect failures, then the monitoring system provides a maximum level of safety, but it cannot detect unsuspected phenomena or unexpected failures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety levelVSAvoiddetection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning during a learning phase to construct behavior models from historical data before actual failure detection begins. This preliminary action enables the system to adapt to unsuspected phenomena while maintaining safety through pre-established baseline behaviors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously compares current flight parameter behaviors against learned behavior models and feeds back deviations for analysis. This feedback mechanism allows the system to detect unexpected failures while maintaining the safety guarantees of structured monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If traditional monitoring systems are used, then obvious anomalies are detected, but maintenance operations cannot be scheduled in advance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detectionVSAvoidmaintenance scheduling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary learning to establish behavior models before operational use, enabling early detection of degradation trends. This allows maintenance to be scheduled in advance based on predicted failure probabilities rather than waiting for obvious anomalies to manifest.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a temporal buffer by detecting early precursors of failure and scheduling maintenance before the actual failure occurs. This cushioning approach prevents flight delays by ensuring maintenance is completed during planned downtime rather than causing unexpected disruptions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Measurement precision

If behavior models are constructed from historical data, then early precursors of failures are identified, but the system requires significant data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure prediction accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments flight data into meaningful behavioral patterns and constructs models from these organized segments. This segmentation reduces processing complexity by working with structured data representations rather than raw continuous streams, while maintaining high prediction accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates simplified behavioral models that copy essential patterns from historical data without requiring processing of the entire raw dataset. These model copies enable efficient real-time comparison while preserving the predictive accuracy gained from comprehensive historical analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS10360741B2Predicting failures in an aircraft
Publication Date: 2019.07.23 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • US10360741B2 patent drawing
  • US10360741B2 patent drawing
  • US10360741B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The disclosure herein proposes identifying precursors to all the phenomena which can have an impact on the service use of an aircraft. It relates to a system for predicting failures in an aircraft, including a processor configured to analyze a current behavior of at least one flight parameter of the aircraft to detect any deviation of the current behavior relative to a predetermined behavior model of the parameter, the behavior model being determined from a plurality of series of learning data relating to the parameter collected during the flights of a set of aircraft.