Aircraft Fire Suppression Mixture for Cargo Explosion Prevention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current alternatives to Halon 1301 for aircraft fire suppression systems fail to pass the United States Federal Aviation Administration's Aerosol Can Explosion Simulation Test, necessitating a new fire suppression method that can effectively suppress fires in aircraft cargo compartments without causing damage or leaving residues.

Innovation Solution

A fire suppression system that combines an inert gas source and a fire suppression agent source to form a mixture, which is simultaneously introduced into the cargo compartment, using a conduit network and controller to ensure effective distribution and concentration, capable of passing the simulation test.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If alternative fire suppression agents are used to replace Halon 1301, then environmental harm is reduced, but the system fails to pass the Aerosol Can Explosion Simulation Test

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental harmVSAvoidtest passage
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines inert gas and fire suppression agent into a unified fire suppression mixture that is delivered simultaneously to the cargo compartment. This merging allows the system to achieve both environmental benefits of alternative agents and the reliability required to pass the Aerosol Can Explosion Simulation Test through synergistic effects of the mixture components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the concentration parameters of the fire suppression mixture by precisely controlling the ratio of inert gas to fire suppression agent. By adjusting these parameters, the system achieves effective fire suppression while maintaining compatibility with the Aerosol Can Explosion Simulation Test requirements, thus resolving the contradiction between environmental harm reduction and test passage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If Halon 1301 is used as fire suppression agent, then fire suppression effectiveness is achieved at low concentrations, but ozone depletion occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveconcentrationVSAvoidozone depletion
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the chemical composition parameters by replacing Halon 1301 with alternative fire suppression agents that have lower or zero ozone depletion potential. The system maintains effective fire suppression by adjusting the concentration parameters of the alternative agents within the fire suppression mixture, thereby eliminating ozone depletion while preserving fire safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a composite fire suppression mixture combining inert gas with alternative fire suppression agents. This composite approach allows the system to achieve the fire suppression effectiveness previously only attainable with Halon 1301 while using environmentally friendly alternatives that do not deplete the ozone layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

3Reliability

If inert gas and fire suppression agent are combined in a mixture, then fire suppression effectiveness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire suppression effectivenessVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the fire suppression system into distinct inert gas source and fire suppression agent source components, each with dedicated storage and delivery pathways. This segmentation allows for simplified management of each component while achieving effective fire suppression through their coordinated operation, thus reducing overall system complexity despite the mixture approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves a fire suppression mixture that can prevent explosions in aircraft cargo compartments, providing an effective alternative to Halon 1301 by maintaining an appropriate inerting concentration of fire suppression agent and added inert gas concentration, thus meeting the test criteria.

Implementation Method 1

an inert gas from the inert gas source and a fire suppression agent from the fire suppression agent source are at least partially combined to form a fire suppression mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas mixing:

Implementation Method 2

Halon 1301 is a clean fire suppression agent; it does not damage cargo or leave behind a residue. Furthermore, unlike inert gas-based fire suppression agents, such as carbon dioxide, Halon 1301 is effective in suppressing fires at relatively low concentrations (e.g., 3 to 10 percent by volume). Therefore, a breathable level of oxygen may remain after discharge of Halon 1301.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxygen displacement:

Data Source

PatentUS10343003B2Aircraft fire suppression system and method
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 THE BOEING CO
  • US10343003B2 patent drawing
  • US10343003B2 patent drawing
  • US10343003B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A fire suppression system for an aircraft having a compartment, the fire suppression system including an inert gas source in selective fluid communication with the compartment and a fire suppression agent source in selective fluid communication with the compartment, wherein an inert gas from the inert gas source and a fire suppression agent from the fire suppression agent source are at least partially combined to form a fire suppression mixture.