Aircraft Fleet Maintenance Scheduling via Degradation Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft fleet operational availability is disrupted by component failures and unscheduled maintenance, requiring improved scheduling methodologies to balance maintenance frequency with downtime and cost constraints while ensuring a Maintenance Free Operating Period (MFOP).

Innovation Solution

A method involving identifying and executing maintenance schedules that satisfy target fleet operational availability by using a degradation model to predict maintenance events, incorporating Monte Carlo simulations with historical and predicted loading coefficients, and monitoring aircraft health to minimize downtime and maintain MFOP.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If maintenance frequency is increased to improve fleet operational availability, then reliability improves, but downtime and maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefleet operational availabilityVSAvoidaircraft downtime
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary health monitoring and degradation analysis to predict maintenance events before they occur. By using prognostics algorithms and degradation models, the system identifies components that will fail in the future, allowing maintenance to be scheduled at optimal times rather than reacting to actual failures, thus reducing unnecessary downtime while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The maintenance scheduling system dynamically adjusts maintenance intervals based on real-time aircraft health data and predicted degradation rates. Instead of fixed schedules, the system adapts maintenance timing to actual component conditions, allowing extensions between maintenance events when health indicators are stable, thereby reducing overall downtime while maintaining fleet availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If maintenance frequency is increased to improve fleet operational availability, then reliability improves, but maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefleet operational availabilityVSAvoidmaintenance costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameters used for maintenance scheduling from fixed time intervals to condition-based thresholds. By monitoring degradation parameters and predicting when components will reach failure thresholds, the system optimizes maintenance timing to perform repairs just before necessary, avoiding both premature maintenance (wasting resources) and delayed maintenance (risking failures), thus reducing overall maintenance costs while maintaining availability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where health monitoring data feeds into degradation models, which update maintenance predictions that inform scheduling decisions. This closed-loop system learns from actual maintenance outcomes and health data patterns, progressively optimizing maintenance timing to minimize costs while ensuring availability targets are met

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If MFOP is extended to reduce maintenance frequency, then productivity improves, but the risk of component failure increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance efficiencyVSAvoidcomponent reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary identification of components that are approaching failure thresholds using degradation analysis and prognostics algorithms. By detecting components that will fail before the extended MFOP expires, the system can schedule targeted maintenance for only those specific components rather than performing blanket maintenance on all aircraft, thus maintaining extended MFOPs while preventing failures

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different maintenance strategies to different components based on their individual health states and degradation rates. Instead of uniform maintenance across all components, the system identifies specific components requiring attention and schedules maintenance locally for those components only, allowing most components to operate beyond traditional MFOPs, thereby improving productivity while maintaining reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP4040352A1A method for improving the operational availability of an aircraft fleet
Publication Date: 2022.08.10 SIMMONDS PRECISION PRODUCTS INC
  • EP4040352A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4040352A1 patent drawing
  • EP4040352A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method including identifying a plurality of maintenance schedules for a plurality of aircraft of a fleet of aircrafts each of which satisfy a minimum maintenance free operating period;, monitoring and measuring a health of each of the aircrafts, utilizing the measured heath of the aircrafts within a degradation model in order to produce a plurality possible maintenance events for each of the aircrafts, each of the possible maintenance events associated with a different maintenance time, identifying at least one maintenance event for each aircraft in the fleet of aircraft using the set of possible maintenance events found for each aircraft from the plurality of maintenance schedules resulting in number of aircraft down for maintenance below a predetermined threshold, and executing the at least one maintenance event based on the at least one identified maintenance event.