Aircraft Flight Controls With Personalized Force Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing fly-by-wire (FBW) aircraft flight control systems lack the ability to provide personalized feedback to pilots, failing to replicate the tactile sensations of mechanically connected controls and thus compromising pilot comfort and control efficiency.

Innovation Solution

An aircraft flight control apparatus with a control input device and a feeling feedback apparatus, controlled by a processing unit that generates aircraft control signals and applies forces based on user-specific profiles, including parameters like spring constant, friction, and damping, to tailor the feel of the controls to individual pilot preferences.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If fly-by-wire control systems are used to improve aircraft control precision and efficiency, then control precision is improved, but pilot comfort and tactile feedback deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol precisionVSAvoidpilot comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements active force feedback systems that provide real-time tactile feedback to the pilot through the control input device. The feedback apparatus generates forces that simulate aerodynamic loads and control surface reactions, allowing pilots to feel aircraft behavior and control surface positions despite the lack of direct mechanical connection, thus maintaining pilot comfort while preserving control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces passive mechanical connection systems with active electronic control systems that use sensors, processors, and actuators. The flight control computer processes pilot inputs and generates control signals, while force feedback actuators replace mechanical linkages to provide tactile feedback, achieving both digital precision and sensory feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If passive mechanical components (springs, dampers, friction elements) are incorporated to replicate control feel, then pilot comfort is improved, but feedback on actual aircraft behaviour is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol feelVSAvoidfeedback on aircraft behaviour
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements active force feedback systems that provide real-time tactile feedback to the pilot through the control input device. The feedback apparatus generates forces that simulate aerodynamic loads and control surface reactions, allowing pilots to feel aircraft behavior and control surface positions despite the lack of direct mechanical connection, thus maintaining pilot comfort while preserving control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from static passive mechanical components to dynamic active electronic systems. The force feedback apparatus can dynamically adjust its characteristics based on flight conditions, aircraft state, and control surface positions, providing accurate tactile representation of actual aircraft behavior rather than fixed mechanical resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Device complexity

If standardized flight controls are used to simplify the system, then device complexity is reduced, but adaptability to different pilot requirements deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to pilot requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables customization of force feedback parameters such as spring constants, damping coefficients, and friction characteristics through software configuration. Pilots can adjust these parameters to match their personal preferences and physical characteristics, allowing standardized hardware to provide personalized control experiences without increasing physical system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a universal flight control system that can serve multiple pilot preferences and aircraft configurations through software programmability. The force feedback apparatus can be configured to provide different control characteristics for various flight phases, aircraft types, and pilot requirements, making a single system adaptable to multiple scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances pilot comfort and reduces fatigue by providing customizable feedback that adapts to individual pilot characteristics, improving control precision and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

a feeling feedback apparatus arranged to apply force to the control input component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce feedback: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentUS20250229891A1Aircraft flight controls
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 RATIER FIGEAC SAS
  • US20250229891A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229891A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229891A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft flight control apparatus includes a control input device comprising a moveable control input component and a feeling feedback apparatus. A processing apparatus is arranged to use user information to determine a control input profile and generate at least one aircraft control signal and/or control the feeling feedback apparatus to apply force to the control input component. The processing apparatus is arranged to generate the at least one aircraft control signal and/or control the feeling feedback apparatus based at least partially on the control input profile.