Aircraft Flight Optimization Algorithm Using Cost Models

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft control systems are inefficient in optimizing economic operations, as they rely on time-consuming and approximate methods for evaluating fuel consumption, maintenance costs, and downtime, lacking real-time and comprehensive analysis for pre-flight planning and in-flight optimization.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a receiver and processor that runs an optimization algorithm using various cost models to determine vehicle operational parameters, including a usage-based lifting cost model, environmental cost model, and financial cost and revenue model, to optimize flight plans and strategies, with real-time output and automatic adjustments for autopilot operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If basic analysis of flight operations is performed to reduce fuel consumption, then fuel efficiency is improved, but the analysis process becomes time consuming and provides only approximate results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidanalysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs pre-flight planning and real-time optimization calculations before and during flight operations, establishing optimal flight parameters in advance and adjusting them dynamically based on actual conditions, thereby avoiding time-consuming post-flight analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously receives actual flight data during operation and compares it with planned parameters, providing real-time feedback for optimization adjustments, which enables precise control without requiring lengthy post-flight analysis periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If historical operational data is analyzed to evaluate maintenance costs and downtime, then cost evaluation is performed, but the process is time consuming and generates only approximate results

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecost evaluation accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects and processes actual operational data during flight, providing real-time feedback on component condition and predicted maintenance needs, thereby delivering accurate cost evaluations without relying on lengthy historical data analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs predictive maintenance analysis by evaluating component wear and failure probability before actual maintenance events occur, allowing operators to plan maintenance activities in advance with accurate cost estimates rather than relying on post-event historical analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS10262545B2Optimal flight planner
Publication Date: 2019.04.16 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORP
  • US10262545B2 patent drawing
  • US10262545B2 patent drawing
  • US10262545B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for a vehicle includes a receiver configured to receive input data, and a processor configured to run an optimization algorithm to evaluate the input data. The optimization algorithm includes at least one cost model configured to determine vehicle operational parameters to meet the input data. An output module is configured to output to the vehicle operational parameters that optimize operation of the vehicle in view of the input data.