Aircraft Buoyancy Float Staging for Stable Ditching Impact

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current buoyancy systems for aircraft face challenges in optimizing stability and reducing load forces during ditching, as well as minimizing the risk of float puncture and depth of impact, particularly when deploying floats in flight before water contact.

Innovation Solution

A method involving the sequential deployment of main and secondary floats, where main floats are deployed in flight prior to ditching to stabilize the aircraft upon impact, and secondary floats are deployed afterward to enhance stability, allowing for smaller main float dimensions and reduced load forces, with secondary floats spaced for improved stability and freedom of movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If floats are deployed in flight before ditching, then buoyancy is optimized and impact depth is minimized, but the buoyancy system must withstand high impact forces and floats may strike aircraft surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuoyancy optimizationVSAvoidimpact force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the float deployment process into two distinct phases: pre-ditching deployment of primary floats for immediate buoyancy, and post-ditching deployment of secondary floats for enhanced stability. This segmentation allows each float type to be optimized for its specific operational phase, reducing the burden on individual floats to withstand all forces simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary deployment of primary floats before ditching occurs. This preliminary action ensures that buoyancy is already optimized when the aircraft contacts water, minimizing impact depth without requiring the floats to absorb the full force of impact alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Ease of manufacture

If floats are deployed after ditching, then float design is simplified and deployment is easier, but buoyancy optimization is delayed until after impact

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefloat design simplicityVSAvoidbuoyancy optimization timing
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the float system into primary floats deployed before ditching and secondary floats deployed after ditching. This segmentation allows primary floats to be simpler in design (deployed after impact when forces have reduced) while secondary floats provide the pre-ditching buoyancy optimization, combining advantages of both approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements preliminary deployment of primary floats before ditching to ensure buoyancy optimization occurs at the critical moment of water contact. This preliminary action compensates for the delayed deployment of secondary floats, maintaining overall reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If single-stage float deployment is used, then system complexity is reduced, but stability optimization during ditching is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment system complexityVSAvoidaircraft stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the buoyancy system into two independent float stages with separate deployment mechanisms. This segmentation enables each stage to be optimized for specific stability requirements during different phases of ditching, achieving superior overall stability compared to single-stage systems while maintaining manageable complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements periodic deployment action where primary floats are deployed in the first period (before ditching) and secondary floats are deployed in the second period (after ditching). This periodic action allows the system to adapt stability characteristics to the specific demands of each phase without requiring a continuously complex control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces load forces on floats and fasteners, minimizes puncture risks, and improves stability during ditching, while also reducing the aircraft's impact depth and load on the airframe, achieving weight savings and enhanced floating stability.

Implementation Method 1

a buoyancy system contributes to enabling an aircraft to float in stable manner after ditching in water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBuoyancy: Archimedes' Principle (Buoyancy)

Data Source

PatentUS11027829B2Aircraft provided with a buoyancy system, and a buoyancy method
Publication Date: 2021.06.08 EUROCOPTER FRANCE SA
  • US11027829B2 patent drawing
  • US11027829B2 patent drawing
  • US11027829B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A buoyancy method for deploying a plurality of floats of a buoyancy system of an aircraft. The plurality of floats comprises a plurality of main floats and a plurality of secondary floats that are folded in flight. The method comprises a step of deploying the main floats in flight prior to ditching, and a step of deploying the secondary floats after ditching.