Aircraft Flow Transition Prediction Using Mode-Shape Parameters

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for predicting the transition from laminar to turbulent flow over aircraft surfaces are time-consuming and require significant user interaction, making them impractical for early phases of aircraft design, where efficiency and accuracy are crucial for optimizing laminar flow regions to reduce drag and improve performance.

Innovation Solution

A method using mode-shape parameters, including boundary-layer properties and instability modes, to predict the transition point by generating a growth-rate model that reduces user interaction and improves simulation efficiency, employing techniques like Singular Value Decomposition for parameterization and linear stability theory to determine n-factor envelopes indicative of laminar or turbulent flow.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional methods are used to predict transition from laminar to turbulent flow, then prediction accuracy is maintained, but simulation time and user interaction requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoidsimulation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction method is segmented into distinct phases: an offline training phase where a neural network is trained using data from traditional stability analysis, and an online prediction phase where the trained network rapidly predicts transition points. This segmentation allows computationally intensive traditional methods to be performed only once during training, while subsequent predictions use the efficient neural network model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network is pre-trained offline using comprehensive data from traditional stability analysis methods before actual design predictions are made. This preliminary action prepares the model in advance, so that during the design phase, predictions can be made rapidly without repeating the full traditional analysis process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If traditional stability analysis methods are used, then detailed flow characteristics are obtained, but computational complexity and user interaction requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction reliabilityVSAvoidmethod complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A neural network is introduced as an intermediary between traditional stability analysis data and final transition predictions. The neural network learns the complex relationships from training data and serves as a simplified mediator that provides reliable predictions without requiring users to navigate the complexity of traditional stability analysis methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The neural network creates a simplified copy or surrogate model of the traditional stability analysis process. This copy captures the essential predictive capabilities of the traditional method while eliminating the computational complexity and user interaction requirements, allowing rapid predictions during design iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If extensive user interaction is required for flow prediction, then prediction accuracy is maintained, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprediction accuracyVSAvoiduser interaction requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The neural network performs predictions autonomously without requiring user interaction during the prediction phase. The model self-services by taking boundary layer parameters as input and automatically producing transition point predictions, eliminating the need for users to configure complex stability analysis parameters or interpret detailed results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS10634581B2Predicting transition from laminar to turbulent flow over a surface using mode-shape parameters
Publication Date: 2020.04.28 AERION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP
  • US10634581B2 patent drawing
  • US10634581B2 patent drawing
  • US10634581B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In accordance with embodiments disclosed herein, there are provided methods, systems, and apparatuses for predicting whether a point on a computer-generated aircraft or vehicle surface is adjacent to laminar or turbulent flow is made using a transition prediction technique. A plurality of boundary-layer properties at the point are obtained from a steady-state solution of a fluid flow in a region adjacent to the point. Included in the list of boundary-layer properties are computed coefficients or weights of mode shapes that describe the boundary-layer profiles. A plurality of instability modes are obtained, each defined by one or more mode parameters. A vector of regressor weights is obtained for the known instability growth rates in a training dataset. For each instability mode in the plurality of instability modes, a covariance vector is determined, which is the covariance of a predicted local growth rate with the known instability growth rates. Each covariance vector is used with the vector of regressor weights to determine a predicted local growth rate at the point. Based on the predicted local growth rates, an n-factor envelope at the point is determined.