Aircraft Fuel Consumption Model Determination via Discrepancy-Triggered Sync

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in providing timely and accurate fuel consumption information to ground-based systems for aircraft, due to limitations in continuous communication, high costs, and potential for errors in intermittent updates.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising one or more control units that determine fuel consumption models for an aircraft based on a calibrated performance model, initial conditions, and real-time data, allowing for efficient updating and validation of these models to ensure accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If continuous connection to flight deck is established to synchronize situational awareness, then information accuracy is improved, but communication cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoidcommunication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses periodic action by establishing continuous connection only when discrepancies are detected between ground-based fuel consumption models and actual aircraft fuel data. Normal operations use intermittent updates, and continuous monitoring activates continuously only when needed, reducing overall communication cost while maintaining information accuracy when required

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring fuel consumption data and comparing it against ground-based models. When discrepancies exceed thresholds, the system triggers continuous connection for synchronization. This feedback mechanism ensures information accuracy is maintained precisely when needed while avoiding unnecessary continuous connections during normal operations, thereby reducing communication costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of energy

If intermittent fuel updates are provided to ground-based systems, then communication cost is reduced, but information accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication costVSAvoidinformation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary action by establishing ground-based fuel consumption models before flight using historical data and performance parameters. These pre-established models allow for accurate fuel consumption tracking during flight without requiring continuous real-time data transmission, reducing communication costs while maintaining information accuracy through comparison with actual fuel data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback by continuously comparing actual fuel consumption data from the aircraft against the pre-established ground-based models. This comparison enables the system to detect discrepancies and trigger continuous connection only when needed, maintaining information accuracy while minimizing communication costs during normal operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If update interval is shortened to improve accuracy, then information accuracy is improved, but communication cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation accuracyVSAvoidcommunication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic action by using short update intervals (continuous monitoring) only when discrepancies are detected between ground-based models and actual fuel data. During normal operations, the system uses longer intervals (intermittent updates), thereby maintaining information accuracy when needed while reducing communication costs during stable flight conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

4Loss of time

If continuous monitoring is implemented to reduce latency, then information timeliness is improved, but communication cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem latencyVSAvoidcommunication cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback by continuously monitoring fuel consumption data and comparing it against ground-based models. This continuous monitoring enables the system to detect discrepancies in real-time and trigger continuous connection for synchronization, reducing latency only when needed while maintaining cost efficiency during normal operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies periodic action by switching between continuous monitoring (short intervals) when discrepancies are detected and intermittent monitoring (longer intervals) during normal operations. This approach reduces system latency precisely when fuel consumption anomalies occur while minimizing communication costs during stable flight conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS12276231B2Systems and methods for determining real time fuel consumption information of an aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 THE BOEING CO
  • US12276231B2 patent drawing
  • US12276231B2 patent drawing
  • US12276231B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes one or more control units configured to determine one or more fuel consumption models for an aircraft. A method includes determining, by one or more control units, one or more fuel consumption models for an aircraft. A non-transitory computer-readable storage medium comprising executable instructions that, in response to execution, cause one or more control units comprising a processor, to perform operations including determining one or more fuel consumption models for an aircraft.