Aircraft Fuel Nozzle Subset Control for Alternative Fuels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The aviation industry faces challenges in operating gas turbine engines efficiently with fuels other than traditional kerosene-based jet fuels, requiring adjustments in fuel properties and operating methods to optimize performance and reduce emissions.

Innovation Solution

A method for operating a gas turbine engine with a combustor featuring a plurality of fuel spray nozzles, including a first and second subset, where the first subset receives more fuel, and a fuel distribution system that provides fuel with a calorific value of at least 43.5 MJ/kg, along with fuel-oil heat exchangers to raise the fuel temperature to 135°C and transfer heat to lower viscosity, optimizing combustion efficiency while minimizing coking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If fuel temperature is increased to improve combustion efficiency, then combustion efficiency is improved, but coking levels increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidcoking levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel spray nozzles are divided into two subsets: a first subset that receives heated fuel (improving combustion efficiency) and a second subset that receives cooler fuel (reducing coking). This segmentation allows different portions of the fuel injection system to operate under different temperature conditions, simultaneously achieving improved combustion while controlling coking.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different subsets of fuel spray nozzles are provided with different fuel temperatures according to their specific operational requirements. The first subset operates with heated fuel for optimal combustion, while the second subset receives cooler fuel to minimize coking, creating local quality variations in the fuel distribution system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of energy

If fuel with higher calorific value is used to reduce fuel burn rate, then fuel consumption is reduced, but fuel properties require adjustment for optimal performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidfuel properties adjustment
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The invention adjusts fuel temperature as a physical parameter to optimize the performance of higher calorific value fuels. By heating the fuel before injection, the system maximizes the energy content utilization of alternative fuels, ensuring they perform optimally in the combustor despite having different chemical properties from traditional jet A-1 fuel.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel is pre-heated in heat exchangers before reaching the combustor, preparing it in advance for optimal combustion. This preliminary thermal treatment ensures that alternative fuels with higher calorific values are properly conditioned to achieve maximum energy release while maintaining system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If more fuel is supplied to certain nozzle subsets to optimize combustion, then combustion efficiency is improved, but fuel distribution complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecombustion efficiencyVSAvoidfuel distribution system
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The fuel distribution system is segmented into two subsets of nozzles with different fuel supply rates. The fuel control system is divided into separate control paths, allowing independent optimization of fuel delivery to each subset without requiring a completely complex centralized control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The fuel distribution system is designed to handle multiple fuel types (traditional jet A-1 and alternative fuels with higher calorific values) using the same basic infrastructure. The system can operate with different fuel blends and temperatures, providing multi-functionality without requiring separate dedicated systems for each fuel type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach improves combustion efficiency, reduces non-volatile particulate matter (nvPM) emissions by 20-80%, and balances combustion efficiency with coking levels, enhancing aircraft performance and reducing undesirable emissions.

Implementation Method 1

fuel-oil heat exchangers to raise the fuel temperature to 135°C and transfer heat to lower viscosity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat transfer: Heat Exchanger

Implementation Method 2

a plurality of fuel spray nozzles configured to inject fuel into the combustion chamber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFuel injection and atomization: Fluid Spray

Implementation Method 3

a combustor, comprising a combustion chamber... providing a fuel to the plurality of fuel spray nozzles having a calorific value of at least 43.5 MJ/kg

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Data Source

PatentUS20250003370A1Aircraft fuel control to subsets of fuel spray nozzles
Publication Date: 2025.01.02 ROLLS ROYCE PLC
  • US20250003370A1 patent drawing
  • US20250003370A1 patent drawing
  • US20250003370A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A gas turbine engine has a combustor with a combustion chamber and a plurality of fuel spray nozzles including a first subset of nozzles and a second subset of nozzles. The first subset of nozzles are supplied with more fuel than the second subset of nozzles. A ratio of the number of nozzles in the first subset to the number of nozzles in the second subset is in the range of 1:2 to 1:5. A method includes providing fuel to the one or more fuel-oil heat exchangers, transferring heat from oil to the fuel, and providing the fuel from the one or more fuel-oil heat exchangers to the fuel spray nozzles. Heat is transferred from the oil to the fuel to lower a viscosity of the fuel to 0.58 mm2/s or lower on injection of the fuel into the combustion chamber at cruise conditions.