Aircraft Ground Heading Control via Automatic Steering Correction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircrafts on the ground experience heading deviations due to external factors like cross winds and uneven runway conditions, as well as internal factors such as uneven engine thrusts and steering system misalignment, requiring frequent pilot intervention to maintain desired headings using steering mechanisms like the tiller and rudder, increasing pilot workload.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that determine a reference heading, monitor deviations, calculate and apply a ground steering angle to correct deviations, and integrate this angle with existing steering commands to automatically maintain the desired heading, using activation and deactivation conditions to operate the system effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the pilot manually controls the heading using steering mechanisms like tiller and rudder, then the aircraft heading can be maintained, but the pilot workload increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheading maintenanceVSAvoidpilot workload
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the aircraft steering system to automatically maintain heading by detecting deviations and generating correction commands without continuous pilot intervention. The ground steering system serves itself by using sensors to monitor aircraft position and automatically adjusting the nose wheel steering angle to counteract veering forces

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors aircraft heading using sensors and compares it with the desired heading, then feeds back steering correction commands to the ground steering system. This closed-loop feedback mechanism automatically compensates for heading deviations caused by crosswinds, runway camber, and other external factors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the pilot frequently adjusts steering to correct veering, then heading accuracy is maintained, but time is lost due to continuous intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheading accuracyVSAvoidtime for steering adjustments
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides continuous automatic heading maintenance through uninterrupted sensor monitoring and steady steering correction, eliminating the intermittent nature of manual pilot adjustments. The useful action of heading control becomes continuous and automated rather than requiring repeated discrete pilot interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual steering operation with an automated electronic control system that uses sensors, processors, and actuators to maintain heading. This substitution eliminates the time delay inherent in manual perception and reaction, providing immediate and consistent heading corrections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Stability of the object's composition

If manual steering control is used to compensate for external factors like crosswinds, then heading stability is achieved, but the complexity of pilot operations increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheading stabilityVSAvoidsteering system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The steering system automatically compensates for external disturbances like crosswinds and runway camber without requiring the pilot to understand or manage the complexity of multiple steering inputs. The system serves itself by detecting heading deviations and autonomously generating appropriate correction commands

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Reliability

If the ground steering system operates continuously, then heading control is maintained, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheading controlVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system operates by periodically detecting heading deviations and applying corrective steering actions only when needed, rather than continuous operation. The control system monitors heading continuously but intervenes only when deviations exceed thresholds, creating a periodic rather than continuous energy-consuming operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies steering corrections only to the extent necessary to maintain heading within acceptable limits, avoiding excessive or unnecessary steering actions. Partial correction is applied based on the magnitude of deviation, consuming energy proportionally to the control need rather than operating at full capacity continuously

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS8463466B2Method, apparatus or software for controlling the heading of an aircraft on the ground
Publication Date: 2013.06.11 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • US8463466B2 patent drawing
  • US8463466B2 patent drawing
  • US8463466B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, apparatus and software is disclosed for controlling the heading of an aircraft travelling on the ground in which veering is detected and compensatory steering commands generated so as to automatically maintain a reference heading.