Aircraft Icing Detection Differentiating Supercooled Water and Ice Crystals

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aircraft icing detection systems are unable to distinguish between supercooled water and ice crystals, which poses a risk to aircraft safety and efficiency, especially in various icing conditions defined by FAA regulations.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a first icing detector capable of detecting both ice water content and liquid water content, and a second icing detector specifically designed to detect liquid water content, in communication with a control unit that differentiates between the two icing conditions and operates airframe and engine ice protection systems accordingly.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single type of icing detector is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision for distinguishing different icing types deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveicing type differentiationVSAvoiddetector system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the detection function into two specialized detectors: a first detector for ice water content and a second detector for liquid water content. This segmentation allows each detector to be optimized for its specific detection target, achieving precise differentiation between supercooled liquid water and ice crystal conditions without requiring a single overly complex detector to handle all types.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If deicers are activated continuously to ensure safety, then the reliability is improved, but the power consumption and fuel consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft safetyVSAvoidpower and fuel consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit receives signals from both detectors and uses this feedback to determine the specific icing condition. Based on the detection results, the control unit selectively activates the appropriate deicer system, ensuring safety while avoiding unnecessary energy consumption. The system only activates deicers when icing conditions are actually detected and selects the appropriate deicer based on the icing type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts deicer activation based on real-time detection data. Instead of continuous operation, the deicers are activated only when and where needed, with the activation decision dynamically determined by the control unit based on signals from the detectors. This dynamic approach maintains safety while optimizing energy and fuel consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If generic ice protection is applied to all icing conditions, then the ease of operation is improved, but the effectiveness in handling specific icing types deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomatic deicer controlVSAvoidicing condition handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit applies different deicer activation strategies based on the specific icing condition detected. When supercooled liquid water is detected, one deicer activation pattern is used, while when ice crystals are detected, a different pattern is applied. This local quality approach ensures that each icing type receives the most effective treatment while maintaining automatic operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively differentiates between supercooled liquid water and ice crystal icing conditions, enabling precise activation of deicers, thereby enhancing aircraft safety, reducing power and fuel consumption, and increasing flight deck crew situational awareness.

Implementation Method 1

a first icing detector capable of detecting both ice water content and liquid water content

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection:

Implementation Method 2

a second icing detector specifically designed to detect liquid water content

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical signal detection:

Implementation Method 3

a control unit that differentiates between the two icing conditions

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSignal processing:

Data Source

PatentEP4261133B1Deicing systems and methods for an aircraft
Publication Date: 2025.03.05 THE BOEING CO
  • EP4261133B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4261133B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4261133B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system and method include a first icing detector configured to detect a first icing condition in relation to one or more portions of an aircraft. The first icing detector is configured to output a first icing signal indicative of the first icing condition. A second icing detector is configured to detect a second icing condition in relation to the one or more portions of the aircraft. The second icing detector is configured to output a second icing signal indicative of the second icing condition. A control unit is in communication with the first icing detector and the second icing detector. The control unit is configured to receive the first icing signal from the first icing detector and the second icing signal from the second icing detector. The control unit is further configured to distinguish between presence of supercooled liquid water and ice crystal icing in response to receiving one or both of the first icing signal or the second icing signal.