Aircraft Icing Threat Detection Using Optical Backscatter Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current aircraft systems lack accurate detection and discrimination capabilities for different icing threats, leading to conservative anti-ice and de-ice usage, which affects safety and operational efficiency due to the inability to discern between ice, ice crystals, mixed-phase water conditions, or super large droplets.

Innovation Solution

A system that employs sensors like Backscatter Cloud Probes with Polarization detection, data fusion, and a reasoner to accurately detect and manage icing threats by providing targeted bleed air and electrical heating responses based on the severity and location of icing, reducing pilot workload and improving safety and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conservative anti-ice and de-ice usage is implemented due to inability to detect ice crystals, then safety is maintained, but operational efficiency deteriorates due to unnecessary bleed air usage

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical/physical ice detection methods with optical detection systems (laser-based particle detection). The system uses laser beams to detect ice crystals in the airstream, transforming the detection mechanism from mechanical contact-based methods to optical field-based detection, enabling identification of ice crystals that previous systems missed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary detection system (optical sensors and particle detectors) between the ice crystals and the anti-ice system activation. This intermediary layer provides accurate information about actual icing conditions, allowing the control system to make informed decisions about when to activate anti-ice systems, avoiding both false positives and false negatives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If accurate detection of ice crystals is implemented, then operational efficiency is improved by reducing unnecessary anti-ice usage, but device complexity increases due to advanced sensors and data processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the detection task into multiple specialized components: laser sources for particle illumination, optical sensors for light scattering detection, particle concentration detectors, and control systems for coordinate measurement. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently while working together to provide comprehensive ice crystal detection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional detection system that can identify different types of airborne particles (ice crystals, supercooled droplets, rain) using the same basic optical detection platform. The system adjusts detection parameters and thresholds based on particle type, providing universal detection capability across various icing conditions without requiring separate specialized systems for each particle type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Loss of energy

If targeted bleed air response is applied based on icing severity, then fuel consumption is reduced, but measurement precision requirements increase to accurately assess icing threat levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel consumptionVSAvoidicing threat assessment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of energyVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes detection parameters (laser wavelength, power, detection thresholds) based on the assessed icing threat level. For low-threat conditions, the system uses lower power settings and higher thresholds to conserve energy and reduce false positives. For high-threat conditions, it increases detection sensitivity and laser power to ensure accurate detection, enabling dynamic energy management based on actual risk

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enhances safety and operational efficiency by accurately identifying and responding to icing threats, reducing unnecessary bleed air usage, and optimizing de-icing resources, thereby improving aircraft performance and reducing fuel consumption.

Implementation Method 1

A first optical sensor receives scattered light along a first viewing path from the detection volume and produces a first detection output

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight scattering: Scattering

Implementation Method 2

A light source emits a beam of light along an emission path, and the emission path is located in a detection volume

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight emission: Light

Data Source

PatentEP3437998B1Managing response to icing threat
Publication Date: 2023.03.08 HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC
  • EP3437998B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3437998B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3437998B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An anti-ice system for an aircraft is provided. The system includes one or more sensors that are configured to generate data indicative of one or more of the size, shape, density and type of air borne particles in the vicinity of the aircraft. The one or more sensors are coupled to a data conditioner that is configured to prepare the data for processing. The data conditioner is coupled to a reasoner that is configured to determine from the data, the severity of an icing threat to an airframe, at least one engine and at least one air data probe. One or more controllers are coupled to the reasoner. The one or more controllers automatically operate an anti-icing mechanism for at least one of the at least one engine, the airframe, and the at least one air data probe depending on the icing threats determined by the reasoner.