Aircraft Landing Risk Mapping for Unprepared Terrain

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for landing aircraft on unprepared terrain do not adequately account for the complexity of terrain analysis and require predefined databases, leading to high cognitive workload and increased accident risk for pilots.

Innovation Solution

An electronic landing assistance device that divides the landing zone into sub-zones, calculates an overall risk level based on topographical, accessibility, visibility, and living being presence characterizations, and reports risk levels to the pilot or avionics system, reducing the need for manual analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a pilot manually analyzes terrain characteristics for landing decisions, then the system can adapt to any terrain condition, but the cognitive workload and stress on the pilot increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveterrain analysis capabilityVSAvoidpilot cognitive workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing terrain characteristics, generating digital surface models, calculating risk levels, and providing landing recommendations without requiring manual pilot analysis. The electronic device independently processes terrain data from multiple sensors and makes assessment decisions, freeing the pilot from cognitive overload while maintaining high adaptability to diverse terrain conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the pilot's manual cognitive analysis mechanism with an automated electronic system. Sensors capture terrain data, which is then processed through digital surface model generation and risk calculation algorithms. This substitution of mechanical (human cognitive) processing with electronic automation significantly reduces pilot workload while maintaining comprehensive terrain analysis capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If existing landing systems use predefined databases, then the system structure is simplified, but the system cannot adequately reflect the complexity of real terrain analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem structureVSAvoidterrain analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-processing terrain data to generate digital surface models and calculate risk levels before the actual landing decision is made. The electronic device proactively analyzes terrain characteristics, generates comprehensive assessments, and provides recommendations in advance, enabling the pilot to make informed decisions without requiring complex real-time calculations during the critical landing phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by transforming raw sensor data into processed terrain characteristics through digital surface model generation. The system dynamically adjusts and processes multiple terrain parameters (elevation, slope, obstacles, visibility) to generate comprehensive risk assessments. This dynamic parameter transformation enables the system to handle complex terrain variability without requiring overly complex predefined database structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system provides comprehensive terrain analysis, then the accuracy of landing safety assessment is improved, but the time required for analysis increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding safety assessment accuracyVSAvoidterrain analysis time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system ensures continuity of useful action by continuously processing terrain data and maintaining updated digital surface models during the approach phase. The electronic device continuously calculates risk levels and monitors changing terrain conditions, providing ongoing accurate assessments without requiring the pilot to stop or pause the landing sequence for analysis. This continuous automated processing delivers high-precision safety assessments efficiently throughout the approach phase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS20250376268A1Method for facilitating the landing of an aircraft, related computer program and electronic device
Publication Date: 2025.12.11 THALES SA
  • US20250376268A1 patent drawing
  • US20250376268A1 patent drawing
  • US20250376268A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of facilitating the landing of a civil aircraft on a potential landing zone divided into sub-zones. The method includes a step of producing a digital surface model of the potential landing zone using topographic terrain data. In a placement step, the digital surface model is positioned and/or orientated in space to obtain a placed digital surface model. In a calculation step, an overall risk level is calculated for each sub-zone on the basis of the placed digital surface model and characteristics of the sub-zone including topography, accessibility, loss of visibility, and presence of living beings. A reporting step comprises generating an information signal dependent on the overall risk levels, and/or transmitting a control signal dependent on the overall risk levels.