Aircraft Landing Approach Optimization via Dynamic Ground Slope Adjustment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircrafts experience hard landings when using increased ground slopes during final approach, which can compromise safety and maneuverability, and existing solutions require significant modifications to aircraft systems and pilot training.

Innovation Solution

A method to optimize the ground slope during the approach phase by determining an optimized vertical speed and ground slope based on aircraft characteristics and external parameters, allowing the aircraft to follow a greater ground slope without structural modifications or additional certification, reducing the risk of hard landings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If an increased ground slope is used during final approach, then environmental impact is reduced and obstacle avoidance is improved, but the risk of hard landings increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidlanding safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention dynamically adjusts the ground slope parameter during the approach phase based on real-time aircraft state and environmental conditions. By continuously optimizing the ground slope rather than using a fixed increased value, the system achieves environmental benefits while preventing hard landings through adaptive parameter modification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by monitoring aircraft vertical speed, ground slope, and other flight parameters, then automatically adjusting the approach trajectory. This feedback mechanism ensures that when hard landing risks are detected, the ground slope is modified to maintain safety while preserving environmental advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Object-affected harmful factors

If an increased ground slope is used during final approach, then obstacle avoidance is improved, but aircraft maneuverability is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidanceVSAvoidmaneuverability
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transforms the static increased ground slope into a dynamic, adaptively adjusted parameter. The system continuously modifies the ground slope based on real-time conditions, providing both obstacle avoidance capabilities and maneuverability when needed, rather than committing to a fixed steep trajectory.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

By changing the ground slope parameter dynamically during approach, the system can transition between steeper trajectories for obstacle avoidance and gentler slopes for improved maneuverability, depending on real-time flight conditions and aircraft state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If an increased ground slope is used during final approach, then environmental impact is reduced, but significant modifications to aircraft systems are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidaircraft system modifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention enables the aircraft's existing flight management system to automatically optimize the ground slope using onboard sensors and computational algorithms. This self-service approach eliminates the need for significant structural modifications while achieving environmental benefits through intelligent control of existing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces mechanical/structural modifications with software-based optimization. Instead of physically modifying aircraft systems to handle increased ground slopes, the system uses computational algorithms to dynamically adjust flight parameters, achieving the same effect without hardware changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If an increased ground slope is used during final approach, then environmental impact is reduced, but additional pilot training is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenvironmental impactVSAvoidpilot training
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs automatic ground slope optimization without requiring pilot intervention or specialized training. The flight management system independently calculates and executes optimal trajectories, allowing pilots to operate normally without additional training while still achieving environmental benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the need for pilot skill development with automated computational optimization. Instead of training pilots to manually manage complex increased ground slope procedures, the system uses algorithms to automatically determine optimal trajectories, eliminating training requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP2498159B1Method for optimising the landing of an aircraft on a runway.
Publication Date: 2014.06.04 AIRBUS OPERATIONS (SAS)
  • EP2498159B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2498159B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP2498159B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for optimizing the landing of an aircraft on a runway. According to the invention, a target vertical speed (Vzo) is defined relative to the ground and an optimized ground slope (γo), associated with an approach axis to be followed (A) during landing, is determined as a function of said target vertical speed (Vzo) and at least one external parameter, which is greater than or equal to a predefined ground slope (γi).