Aircraft Lighting Erosion Detector Optical Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Aircraft exterior lighting devices suffer from wear due to airstream-borne particles, necessitating regular replacement of covers to maintain illumination quality, which can compromise flight safety if delayed but incur unnecessary costs if done prematurely.

Innovation Solution

An erosion detector is integrated into the exterior aircraft lighting device, comprising a light source, light detection element, and evaluation unit that assesses the state of the transparent cover by comparing reflected light signals to a reference value, triggering an alarm when deterioration exceeds a threshold, and featuring a calibration unit to set reference values automatically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the cover is replaced regularly to maintain illumination quality, then flight safety is improved, but maintenance costs and grounding times increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidgrounding time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The erosion detector performs preliminary detection of cover wear conditions before critical deterioration occurs. The detection system continuously monitors the cover state and triggers replacement only when erosion reaches problematic levels, allowing planned maintenance rather than reactive or overly conservative scheduling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback through the evaluation unit that compares detected light properties against reference values. This feedback mechanism provides objective information about cover erosion state, enabling data-driven replacement decisions that balance safety requirements with operational efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the cover is replaced early to ensure illumination quality, then flight safety is improved, but unnecessary maintenance costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveillumination qualityVSAvoidmaintenance cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The lighting device performs self-diagnosis through the integrated erosion detector. The system autonomously monitors its own cover condition and determines when replacement is necessary, eliminating the need for conservative scheduled maintenance and enabling replacement only when actually needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual inspection and subjective assessment with an automated optical detection system. The light detection element and evaluation unit provide objective, quantitative measurement of cover erosion, substituting human judgment with precise instrumental measurement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If manual inspection methods are used to determine cover wear, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection system complexityVSAvoiderosion detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual visual inspection with an automated optical measurement system. The light detection element quantitatively measures light properties that change with cover erosion, providing objective and repeatable measurements that are superior to subjective human assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system detects erosion by monitoring changes in light parameters (intensity, distribution, or other optical properties) as the cover deteriorates. By translating physical cover wear into measurable optical parameter changes, the system achieves precise, quantitative detection of erosion progression.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for timely and cost-effective replacement of covers, enhancing flight safety by reducing maintenance costs and grounding times while minimizing false alarms through a reliable and automatic detection system.

Implementation Method 1

detecting light reflected by the at least partially transparent cover and providing a corresponding detection signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLight reflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentEP3073249B1Erosion detector for an exterior aircraft lighting device and exterior aircraft lighting device comprising the same
Publication Date: 2019.11.20 GOODRICH LIGHTING SYST GMBH
  • EP3073249B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3073249B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3073249B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5

AI summary

An erosion detector (2) for an exterior aircraft lighting device (1) is configured for detecting the state of erosion of an at least partially transparent cover (4) of an exterior aircraft lighting device (1) and includes: at least one light source (6), which is configured for radiating light onto the at least partially transparent cover (4); at least one light detection element (8), which is configured for detecting light reflected by the at least partially transparent cover (4) and for providing a corresponding detection signal; and an evaluation unit (10), which is configured for evaluating the detection signal for determining the state of erosion of the at least partially transparent cover (4).